تولیدات گیاهی

تولیدات گیاهی

ارتباط نوارهای گلیادین با ویژگی‌های کیفیت نانوایی در ژنوتیپ‌های گندم نان

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی - اصلاح نباتات

نویسندگان
1 گروه به‌نژادی و بیوتکنولوژی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران
2 گروه تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ارومیه. ارومیه، ایران
چکیده
در مورد محصول راهبردی مانند گندم، که بخش عمده ای از جیرۀ غذایی جوامع بشری به ویژه در کشورهای در حال توسعه را تشکیل می‌دهد، به‌نژادی برای ویژگی‌های کیفیت نانوایی به‌اندازۀ به‌نژادی برای عملکرد حائز اهمیت است. در این راستا شناسایی و استفاده از نشانگرهای مولکولی مرتبط با صفات کیفیت نانوایی در انتخاب ژنوتیپ‌های دارای کیفیت بالا سودمند است. پروتئین‌های گلوتنی، یکی از این نشانگرها بوده که مهم‌ترین پروتئین‌‌‌های ذخیره ای دانۀ گندم هستند و از دو جز مهم گلیادین و گلوتنین تشکیل شده اند. ازآنجاکه انواع آلل‌های پروتئینی گلیادین نشانگرهایی مطمئنی در شناسایی ذخایر توارثی، بررسی تنوع ژنتیکی و ارزیابی کیفیت نانوایی محسوب می‌شوند، این مطالعه برای بررسی این روابط در دانشگاه تبریز، سال 1394 اجرا شد. در این آزمایش، ابتدا الگوی نواری پروتئین گلیادین 40 ژنوتیپ گندم، شامل 28 لاین اینبرد نوترکیب )نسل (F6 به‌همراه والدین (زاگرس و نورستار) و 10 رقم تجاری، با استفاده از الکتروفورز عمودی ژل آکریل‌آمید به ‌روش A-PAGE تعیین شد. برای این منظور از نوار 50 گلیادین گندم مارکوئیس به‌عنوان نشانگر استفاده شد. حضور و عدم‌حضور نوارها به‌ترتیب با کدهای یک و صفر مشخص و امتیازدهی شدند. سپس ارتباط الگوی پروتئین گلیادین (زیرواحدهای ω، γ، β و α) با صفات مرتبط با کیفیت نانوایی به‌روش تجزیه رگرسیون خطی گام‌به‌گام روی صفات وزن هکتولیتر، وزن هزار دانه، درصد پروتئین، عدد ‌زلنی، حجم نان، درصد رطوبت دانه، درصد جذب آب، گلوتن مرطوب و شاخص‌گلوتن، حجم رسوب SDS و سختی دانه تعیین شد. همبستگی اسپیرمن بین نوار‌های گلیادین نیز محاسبه شد. نتایج حاصل نشان از وجود روابط مثبت و منفی معنی‌دار بین نوارهای پروتئینی داشت. البته برخی نوار‌ها مانند نوار‌های 6 و 9، 5/20 و 5/27، 29 و 5/34، و 5/34 و 37 با یکدیگر همبستگی مستقیم و کامل داشتند (r=1). تعداد پنج نوار پروتئینی از چهار جزء (ω، γ، β و α) تشکیل‌دهندۀ پروتئین گلیادین با هریک از صفات سختی دانه، حجم نان، گلوتن مرطوب و وزن دانه، چهار نوار پروتئینی با هریک از صفات درصد پروتئین، وزن هکتولیتر، شش نوار پروتئینی با صفات حجم رسوب SDS، شاخص گلوتن و درصد جذب رطوبت و هفت نوار پروتئینی با صفات حجم رسوب زلنی و درصد رطوبت دانه ارتباط معنی‌دار نشان دادند. در این میان فقط صفت حجم رسوب SDS با هر شش نوار پروتئینی ارتباط معنی‌داری نشان داد. نتایج حاکی از نقش برجستۀ بخش های ω و α گلیادین در ارتباط با صفات تعیین‌کنندۀ کیفیت نانوایی بود. با توجه به روابط مشاهده شده میان برخی نوارهای گلیادینی با چندین صفت کیفی، می‌توان از این آلل‌ها جهت گزینش ژنوتیپ‌های دارای کیفیت مطلوب نانوایی استفاده کرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Association of gliadin bands with bread making quality traits in bread wheat genotypes

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Vahed 1
Seyed Siamak Alavi Kia 1
Mostafa Valizadeh 1
Nasrin Akbari 2
1 Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
2 Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Wheat is one of the strategic crops worldwide in terms of human food consumption. Improved yield in grain as well as its quality for processing into flour for human consumption are the two major goals of any breeding program for ensuring food security particularly in developing countries. High baking quality is essential for producing acceptable bread and reducing post-baking losses. The use of molecular markers has facilitated the identification of genotypes with superior baking properties. Among these markers, seed storage proteins provide reliable indicators for assessing flour functionality. Gluten, the principal protein complex responsible for wheat dough properties, consists of gliadins and glutenins, which contribute differently to dough behavior. Glutenins primarily determine dough elasticity and strength, whereas gliadins influence viscosity and extensibility. The allelic diversity in gliadin proteins has been used as a marker system to characterize germplasm and to predict the baking quality of wheat. As a result, gliadin markers have become important tools for breeding wheat which has the processing properties and end-use quality that are required by growers and end-users.

Materials and Methods
In this study, gliadin banding profiles of 40 wheat genotypes—including 28 F₆ recombinant inbred lines from the Zagros × Norstar cross and 10 commercial cultivars—were characterized using A-PAGE vertical acrylamide gel electrophoresis. Marquis wheat band no. 50 served as the reference marker for scoring. Protein bands were visually identified, and their presence or absence was recorded as binary data. To determine the functional relevance of gliadin variation, associations between gliadin subunits (ω, γ, β, and α) and key bread-making quality parameters were analyzed. The evaluated traits included hectoliter weight, thousand-grain weight, protein content, Zeleny value, loaf volume, moisture, water absorption, wet gluten, gluten index, SDS sedimentation, and grain hardness. Stepwise linear regression was applied to identify gliadin bands significantly contributing to variation in quality traits. Additionally, Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to assess relationships among gliadin bands and their potential co-inheritance patterns.

Results and Discussion
The results revealed both significant positive and negative correlations among gliadin protein bands, with several pairs such as 6 and 9, 20.5 and 27.5, 29 and 34.5, and 34.5 and 37 showing complete correlation, indicative of block inheritance within specific gene families. Five bands across the ω, γ, β, and α fractions were significantly associated with grain hardness, loaf volume, wet gluten content, and grain weight. Four bands showed significant relationships with protein percentage and hectoliter weight. Six bands were linked to SDS sedimentation volume, gluten index, and moisture absorption. Furthermore, seven bands exhibited significant associations with Zeleny sedimentation value and grain moisture content at the 5% and 1% significance levels, highlighting the predictive potential of gliadin markers for bread-making quality. Strong and significant correlations were also observed between some gliadin protein bands with several traits and several traits with a specific gliadin band. The existence of such relationships is important in breeding programs.

Conclusion
The findings highlighted the dominant contribution of ω- and α-gliadin fragments to key traits underlying bakery quality, underscoring their value in quality assessment. Several gliadin bands showed simultaneous associations with multiple traits, indicating their pleiotropic effects. These alleles therefore represent reliable molecular indicators for identifying superior genotypes. Consequently, they can be effectively integrated into selection strategies aimed at improving bakery quality.



کلیدواژه‌ها English

A-PAGE
Correlation
Gluten index
Gliadin proteins
Protein markers
Akbari, N., Alavi Kia, S.S., Majid Norozi, M., & Valizadeh, M. (2017). Relationship between HMW-GS bands and bread making quality traits in recombinant inbred lines derived from a cross between Zagros and Norstar wheat varieties. Cereal Research, 7(2), 185-194. https://doi.org/10.22124/c.2017.2545 [In Persian].
Axford, D.W.E., McDermott, E.E., & Redman, D.G. (1979). Note the sodium dodecyl sulfate test of bread-making quality; comparison with Pleshnke and Zeleny tests. Cereal Chemistry, 56, 582-584.
Badakhshan, H. (2001). Investigation of grain gliadins in autumn wheats of the northwest of the country and their relationship with bakery quality. MSc dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz. Iran. [In Persian].
Bahnia, M.R. (1997). Cold grain cereals. Publication Institute of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, first edition. [In Persian].
Barak, S., Mudgil, D., & Khatkar, B. (2013). Relationship of gliadin and glutenin proteins with dough rheology, flour pasting and bread making performance of wheat varieties. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 51(1), 211-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.09.011.
Bushuk, W., & Zillman, R.R. (1978). Wheat cultivar identification by gliadin electrophoregrams. I. Apparatus, method and nomenclatuie. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 58(2), 505-515. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps78-076
Cauvain, S.P. (2001). Bread making, In: cereal processing technology Owens, G, (ed) Improving Quality. Woodhead Publishing Limited Cambridge England. PP. 204-230.
Chaudhary, N., Singh Virdi, A., Dangi, P., Singh Khatkar, B., Kumar Mohanty, A., & Singh, N. (2022). Protein, thermal and functional properties of α-, γ- and ω-gliadins of wheat and their effect on bread making characteristics. Food Hydrocolloids, 124, Part (A). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107212
FAO (2022). https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home.
Gil-Humanes, J., Pistón, F., Tollefsen, S., Sollid, L.M., & Barro, F. (2010). Effective shutdown in the expression of celiac disease-related wheat gliadin T-cell epitopes by RNA interference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(39), 17023e17028. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007773107
Gil-Humanes, J., Pistón, F., Rosell, C.M., & Barro. F. (2012). Significant down-regulation of g-gliadins has minor effect on gluten and starch properties of bread wheat. Journal of Cereal Science, 56(2), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2012.02.009
Hasrak, S., Lohrasebi, T., Bagheri, A., Shariati, V., Marashi, H., & Razavi, K. (2019). A study to assess the role of gluten encoded genes and their regulatory elements in bread making quality of wheat. Iranian Journal of Biotechnology, 17(4), e2164. https://doi.org/10.30498/ijb.2019.82861
He, J., Penson, S., Powers, S.J., Hawes, C., Shewry, P.R., & Tosi, P. (2013). Spatial patterns of gluten protein and polymer distribution in wheat grain. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61(26), 6207-6215. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf401623d.
Karatigger, A.F., Payne, P.I., & Law, C.N. (1996). Effects of homoeologous group 1 and 6 chromosomesof the cappelle- desprez (Bezostaya 1) substitution lines on aspects of bread-making quality of Wheat. Euphytica, 89(1), 17-25.
Kasarda, D.D, Autran, J.C, Lew, E.J.L, Nimmo, C.C., & Shewry, P.R. (1983). N-terminal amino acid sequences of ω-gliadins and ω-secalins: Implications for the evolution of prolamin genes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 747(1-2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4838(83)90132-2.
Kasarda, D.D., Adalstein, A.E., & Laird, N.F. (1987). γ-Gliadins with α-type structure coded on chromosome 6B of the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar ‘Chinese spring’. In: Lásztity R, Békés F (eds) Proc. 3rd Int. workshop on gluten proteins. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, pp. 20–29.
Khatkar, B.S., Fido, R.J., Tatham, A.S., & Schofield, J.D. (2002). Functional properties of wheat gliadins. I. effects on mixing characteristics and bread making quality. Journal of Cereal Science, 35(3), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.2001.0429.
Kosmolak, F.G., Dexter, J.E., Matsuo, R.R., Leisle, D., & Marchylo, B.A. (1980). A relationship between durum wheat quality and gliadin electrophorgram. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 60(2), 427-432. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps80-064
Lafiandra, D., & Kasarda, D.D. (1985). One and two-dimentional. (two-ph) polyacrilamid gel electrophoresis in single gel: Separation of wheat proteins. Cereal Chemistry, 62(5), 314-319.
Laidig, F., Piepho, H.-P., Hüsken, A., Begemann, J., Rentel, D., Drobek, T., & Meyer, U. (2018). Predicting loaf volume for winter wheat by linear regression models based on protein concentration and sedimentation value using samples from VCU trials and mills. Journal of Cereal Science, 84, 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2018.07.015.
Marín-Sanz, M., & Barro, F. (2022). RNAi silencing of wheat gliadins alters the network of transcription factors that regulate the synthesis of seed storage proteins toward maintaining grain protein levels. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 935851. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.935851.
Metakovsky, E., Melnik, V.A., Pascual, L., & Wrigley, C.W. (2024). How important are genetic diversity and cultivar uniformity in wheat? the case of gliadins. Genes, 15(7), 927. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070927
Melnikova, N.V., Kudryavtseva, A.V., & Kudryavtsev, A.M. (2012). Catalogue of alleles of gliadin-coding loci in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Biochimie, 94(2), 551-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2011.09.004.
Mishra, D., Shekhar, S., Chakraborty, S., & Chakraborty, N. (2021). High temperature stress responses and wheat impacts and alleviation strategies. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 190, 104589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104589.
Norouzdokht-Nokhandan, S., Izanloo, A., Zabet, M., & Ghaderi, M.G. (2017). Identification of alleles affecting the grain hardness in different bread wheat cultivars using molecular markers. Journal of Crop Breeding, 9(21), 122-129. [In Persian].
Payne, P.I. (1987). Genetics of wheat storage proteins and the effect of allelic variations on breadmaking quality. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 38, 141-153.
Payan, R. (1998). An Introduction to the technology of cereal products. Novardasan Publications. Iran. [In Persian].
Schuster, C., Huen, J., & Scherf, K.A. (2023). Comprehensive study on gluten composition and baking quality of winter wheat. Cereal Chemistry, 100(1), 142-155. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/cche.10606.
Sozinov, A.A., & Poperelya, F.A. (1979). Prolamin polymorphism and plant breeding, Building Agriculture Science, 10, 21-34. [In Russian].
Soorninia, F., Najaphy, A., Kahrizi, D., Mostafaie, A., & Mehrabi, A.A. (2022). Investigation of seed storage proteins diversity in some durum wheat landraces and cultivars.45(3), 385-396. https://doi.org/10.22055/ppd.2022.39915.2012 [In Persian].
Tarekegne, A., & Labuschagne, M.T. (2005). Relationship between high molecular weight glutenin subunit composition and gluten quality in Ethiopian-grown bread durum wheat cultivars and lines. Journal Agronomy and Crop Science, 191(4), 300-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2005.00147.x
Urade, R., Sato, N., & Sugiyama, M. (2018). Gliadins from wheat grain: an overview, from primary structure to nanostructures of aggregates. Biophysical Reviews, 10(2), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-017-0367-2.
Utebayev, M., Dashkevich, S., Bome, N., Bulatova, K., & Shavrukov, Y. (2019). Genetic diversity of gliadin-coding alleles in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) from Northern Kazakhstan. PeerJ, 7:e7082  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7082.
Wieser, H., Koehler, P., Folck, A., & Becker, D. (2007). Characterization of wheat with strongly reduced a-gliadin content. In: Lookhart, G.L., Ng, P.K.W. (Eds.), Gluten Proteins. AACC, St Paul, MN, pp. 13-16.
Wrigley, C.W., Autran, J.C., & Bushuk, W. (1992). Identification of cereal varieties by gel electrophoresis of the grain proteins. Cereal Science and Technology, 5, 211-259.
Wu, X.I., Lan, X.j., Wei, Y.M., Pu, Z.E., & Zheng, Y.l. (2009). Quality evaluation of gliadins from zhengmai 9023x99E18 in wheat. Journal of Plant Sciences, 4(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3923/jps.2009.1.9
Zeleny, L. (1947). A simple sedimentation test for estimating the bread-making and gluten qualities of wheat flour. Cereal Chemistry, 24(6), 465-475.
Zhang, X., Jin, H., Zhang, Y., Liu, D., Li, G., Xia, X., He, Z., & Zhang, A. (2012). Composition and functional analysis of low-molecular-weight glutenin alleles with Aroona near-isogenic lines of bread wheat. BMC Plant Biology, 12(1), 243. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-243