تولیدات گیاهی

تولیدات گیاهی

اثر تنش خشکی طولانی ‌مدت بر تجمع مادۀ خشک و غلظت عناصر غذایی در پایه‌های دانهالی و رویشی گلابی (.Pyrus spp) و دو پایۀ تجاری به (Cydonia oblonga Mill)

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی - فیزیولوژی و اصلاح درختان میوه

نویسندگان
1 گروه علوم و مهندسی باغبانی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
2 پژوهشکده میوه‌های معتدله و سردسیری، موسسه تحقیقات علوم باغبانی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران
3 گروه زراعت، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
چکیده
پتانسیل ژنتیکی گونه‌های وحشی جنس Pyrus فرصت ارزشمندی را برای به‌نژادگران فراهم می‌کند تا پایه‌های گلابی متحمل به خشکی را در میان ژرم‌پلاسم درختان میوه شناسایی کنند. این پژوهش با هدف ارزیابی تحمل به خشکی گونه‌های وحشی Pyrus به‌عنوان پایه‌های دانهالی، همراه با برخی پایه‌های رویشی گلابی و به، در شرایط آبیاری مطلوب و تنش خشکی انجام شد. مواد گیاهی شامل دانهال‌های ۱۰ گونۀ بومی و وارداتی گلابی (Pyrus)، یک هیبرید بین‌گونه‌ای تجاری (Q1)، پایۀ رویشی پیرودوارف (متحمل به بیماری آتشک)، و دو پایۀ رویشی به نام‌های کوئینس EMA و BA29 از گونه به (.Cydonia oblonga Mill) بود. پس از ۲۷۰ روز استقرار در گلخانۀ تحقیقاتی دانشکدۀ کشاورزی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، گیاهان یکنواخت از نظر طول و قطر انتخاب شدند و در سال زراعی ۱۴۰۰–۱۴۰۱ تحت دو تیمار آبیاری شامل آبیاری کامل (۱۰۰ درصد ظرفیت زراعی، شاهد) و تنش خشکی (قطع آبیاری به مدت ۲۱ روز) قرار گرفتند. در این آزمایش، وزن تر و خشک اندام‌ هوایی و ریشه و نیز غلظت عناصر غذایی نیتروژن، فسفر، پتاسیم، گوگرد، منیزیم و کلسیم در برگ و ریشه به صورت جداگانه برای ۱۱ گونۀ گلابی، پایۀ رویشی پیرودوارف و دو پایۀ EMA و BA29 اندازه گیری شد. نتایج  نشان داد وزن تر و خشک اندام‌ هوایی و ریشه به صورت معنی­داری تحت اثر تنش خشکی قرار گرفت. در این میان، دانهال‌های گونۀP. communis  عملکرد بهتری نسبت به سایر ژنوتیپ‌ها داشتند و کمترین مقادیر در پایه‌های رویشی به مشاهده گردید. بیشترین و کمترین وزن تر ریشه تحت تنش خشکی به ترتیب در گونه Q1 و پایه پیرودوارف ثبت شد. گونه‌ P. nivalis  کاهش کمتری در میزان نیتروژن ریشه نسبت به شرایط شاهد از خود نشان داد، درحالی­که  P. amygdaliformis کمترین میزان نیتروژن را در شرایط تنش دارا بود. بیشترین میزان نیتروژن برگ نیز در P. nivalis  و کمترین آن در پایۀ رویشی و پاکوتاه کننده EMA و تحت تنش خشکی مشاهده شد. در شرایط تنش، غلظت فسفر ریشه در اغلب ژنوتیپ‌ها افزایش یافت و جذب عناصری مانند فسفر، پتاسیم، منیزیم و گوگرد در برگ بسته به ژنوتیپ متفاوت بود. تنش خشکی اثر معنی‌داری بر فسفر، پتاسیم و کلسیم داشت، اما بر منیزیم و گوگرد تأثیر قابل‌توجهی نشان نداد. پایه کوئینس EMA نیز توانست بیشترین میزان گوگرد و کلسیم را در ریشه و برگ تحت تنش حفظ کند. به طور کلی  گونه‌ها و پایه­های رویشی مورد مطالعه واکنش‌های متفاوتی  نسبت به تنش خشکی و جذب و نگه‌داشت عناصر معدنی نشان دادند. تنش خشکی موجب کاهش وزن خشک اندام هوایی در برخی گونه‌ها و تمامی پایه‌های رویشی شد، اما دانهال‌های P. nivalis، P. hyrcana، P. syriaca، P. betulifolia، LGI477 و LGI456 کمتر تحت تأثیر قرار گرفتند. بنابراین، این ژنوتیپ‌ها می‌توانند به‌عنوان گزینه‌های امیدوارکننده برای مطالعات آینده در زمینۀ تحمل به خشکی مورد توجه قرار گیرند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The effect of prolonged drought stress on dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake in seedling and clonal rootstocks of pear (Pyrus spp.) and two commercial quince rootstocks (Cydonia oblonga Mill)

نویسندگان English

Ali Rezaei 1
Kazem Arzani 1
Hamid Abdollahi 2
Ali Mokhtassi-Bidgoli 3
Nima Ahmadi 1
1 Department of Horticultural Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Temperate Fruits Research Center, Horticultural Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
3 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Iran is a major center of pear (Pyrus) germplasm diversity, offering strong potential for selecting drought-tolerant genotypes. This study aimed to assess the effects of drought stress on biomass accumulation and nutrient uptake in seedlings of different Pyrus species and commercial pear rootstocks.
Materials and Methods
The collected seeds were sown in trays under greenhouse conditions. After germination, seedlings were transplanted into the growth bags filled with a suitable medium. After nine months' establishment, the uniform plants were randomly assigned to two groups: a control group with regular irrigation every 3 days, and a drought-stress group with irrigation withheld for 21 days. At the end of the drought period, shoots and roots were separated, fresh weights measured, and samples oven-dried at 50°C for two weeks to determine dry weights. Macronutrients (N, P, K) and micronutrients (Mg, Ca, S) were analyzed in roots and shoots. The experiment followed a factorial design within a completely randomized design, involving two irrigation regimes and 14 Pyrus genotypes.
Results and Discussion
Data from the interaction effects of drought stress on root fresh and dry weights revealed that the Q1 and the Dargazi had the highest root fresh weight, while the Pyrodwarf showed the lowest fresh and dry root weights. Mean comparisons indicated that in P. nivalis, P. hyrcana, P. syriaca, P. betulifolia, and the seedling genotypes LGI477 and LGI456 (derived from P. communis), the shoot dry weight under drought stress was higher than control. These genotypes may possess superior physiological, biochemical, and molecular adaptation mechanisms to drought. Moreover, P. pashia, P. betulifolia, P. amygdaliformis, Q1, the promising LGI477 genotype, and the quince rootstock BA29 exhibited higher root dry weight under drought stress than control, indicating stronger root growth under drought condition. In P. nivalis, P. syriaca, Q1, Dargazi, LGI477, and BA29 rootstock, root nitrogen did not decrease under drought, while in other genotypes, a reduction was observed. However, leaf nitrogen increased under drought in most genotypes, except for P. pashia, P. hyrcana, P. amygdaliformis, and BA29 rootstock, where it declined. Drought stress also generally increased root phosphorus content in most species and rootstocks, except for P. hyrcana, P. calleryana, and LGI477, which did not show such increases. In contrast, leaf phosphorus responses under drought were variable: increases in P. amygdaliformis and P. nivalis, decreases in Dargazi, and no significant change in P. hyrcana, P. syriaca, and LGI456. Root potassium content responded differently across genotypes, decreasing in P. nivalis, P. betulifolia, hybrid Q1, Dargazi, and Pyrodwarf rootstock, but increasing in others. Leaf potassium levels showed wide variation, with P. syriaca having the highest and Dargazi and LGI456 having the lowest values under drought stress. Dargazi showed the highest root magnesium content, while P. nivalis had the lowest; EMA and BA29 rootstocks showed no significant differences. The quince rootstock EMA had the highest root sulfur content under drought. Overall, drought stress had less pronounced effects on magnesium and sulfur than on other nutrients.
Conclusion
The findings of this study reveal clear differences among species and rootstocks in their responses to drought stress, particularly regarding their capacity to absorb and retain essential mineral nutrients under water-deficit conditions. Analysis of mean trait values revealed significant variation in how different genotypes and rootstocks cope with drought. Previous studies have reported that drought conditions typically reduce the number of lateral roots and overall root volume while promoting deeper vertical root growth. Furthermore, terminal buds tend to enter a dormancy phase, halting the plant’s longitudinal growth. As a consequence of drought stress, various growth indices decline, with the severity of reduction differing among the evaluated genotypes and rootstocks. Besides, according to the results of this study, rootstocks that demonstrated the highest dry matter accumulation in their roots during drought, along with relatively sustained growth performance, may serve as promising candidates for future breeding programs aimed at drought tolerance. Although drought stress generally led to reduced absorption of most mineral elements in both leaves and roots, the efficiency of nutrient uptake did not appear to be severely disrupted.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Germplasm
Local pear of Iran
Root dry weight
Root to shoot relationship
Withholding irrigation
Abdollahi, H. (2010). Pear: Botany, Cultivars and Rootstocks. Ministry of Agriculture, Tehran, Iran. 210pp. [In Persian].
Arji, I., & Arzani, K. (2003). Evaluation of the growth responses and proline accumulation in three Iranian native olive cultivars under drought stress. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 10 (2), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijhs.2018.246776.1356 [In Persian].
Arzani, K. (2004). The effect of European pear (Pyrus communis L.) and quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill L.) seedling rootstocks on growth and performance of some Asian pear (Pyrus serotina Rhed.) cultivars. Acta Horticulturae, 658, 93-97. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.658.10
Arzani, K. (2015). The impact of environment changes and conditions on fruit trees germplasm and yield of established orchards in Iran, in: In: Proceedings of the 3rd World Biodiversity Congress (WBC2015). Mecavnik – Mokra Gora, Serbia, p. 40.
Asayesh, Z. M., Arzani, K., Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A., & Abdollahi, H. (2023). Enzymatic and non-enzymatic response of grafted and ungrafted young European pear (Pyrus communis L.) trees to drought stress. Scientia Horticulturae, 310, 111745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111745
Chaves, M.M., & Oliveira, M.M. (2004). Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 2365–2384. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh269
Da Silva, E. C., Nogueira, R. J. M. C., Da Silva, M. A., & De Albuquerque, M. B. (2011). Drought stress and plant nutrition. Plant stress, 5(1), 32-41.
Devyatov, A. S. (1994). Development of root system of pear trees on seedling and quince rootstocks. Journal of plant nutrition, 17(11), pp. 1963-1973. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169409364858
Dong, X., Wang, Z., Tian, L., Zhang, Y., Qi, D., Huo, H., Xu, J., Li, Z., Liao, R., Shi, M., Wahocho, S.A., Liu, C., Zhang, S., Tian, Z., & Cao, Y. (2020). De novo assembly of a wild pear (Pyrus betuleafolia) genome. Plant biotechnology journal, 18(2), 581–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13226
Esmaeili, A., Abdollahi, H., Bazgir, M., & Abdossi, V. (2021). Growth and nutrient uptake in commercial pear cultivars on seedling, Pyrodwarf®, and OH × F69 Rootstocks. Seed and Plant Journal, 36(4): 403-420. https://doi.org/10.22092/sppi.2021.123892 [In Persian].
Farhadi, H., Sharifani, M. M., Alizadeh, M., Hokmabadi, H. & Aliniaifard, S. (2020). Investigating the Effect of Different Drought Levels on the Concentration of Low-Consumption and High-Consumption Mineral Elements of Pistachio Rootstocks and Interstitial Hybrids of Pistachio (Pistacia vera L.). Journal of Pistachio Science and Technology, 5(9), 46-69. [In Persian].
Farooq, M., Hussain, M., Wahid, A., & Siddique, K.H.M. (2012). Drought Stress in Plants: An Overview. In: Aroca, R. (eds) Plant Responses to Drought Stress. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Ferguson, L. (1995). Pistachio production. Center of Fruit and Nut Crop Research and Information. University of California at Davis. Department of Pomology, USA. Pp: 160.
Fournier, J. M., Roldán, Á. M., Sánchez, C., Alexandre, G., & Benlloch, M. (2005). K+ starvation increases water uptake in whole sunflower plants. Plant Science, 168(3), 823-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.10.015
Garwood, E. A., & Williams, T. B. (1967). Growth, water use, and nutrient uptake from the subsoil by grass swards. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 69(1), 125-130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960001652X
Guo, C., Zhu, L., Sun, H., Han, Q., Wang, S., Zhu, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, K., Bai, Z., Li, A., Liu, L., & Li, C. (2024). Evaluation of drought-tolerant varieties based on root system architecture in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). BMC Plant Biol, 24, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04799-x
Hasan, M.M., Skalicky, M., Jahan, M.S., Hossain, M.N., Anwar, Z., Nie, Z., Alabdallah, N.M., Brestic, M., Hejnak, V., & Fang, X.W. (2021). Spermine: Its emerging role in regulating drought stress responses in plants. Cells, 10, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10020261
Heidari Sharif Abad, H. (2001). Plant, drought, and aridity. Research Institute of Forest and Rangelands. Tehran edition. [In Persian].
Huang, L., Li, M., Zhou, K., Sun, T., Hu, L., Li, C., & Ma, F. (2018). Uptake and metabolism of ammonium and nitrate in response to drought stress in Malus prunifolia. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 127: 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.03.031
Ikinci, A., Bolat, I., Ercisli, S., & Kodad, O. (2014). Influence of rootstocks on growth, yield, fruit quality, and leaf mineral element contents of pear cv. 'Santa Maria' in semi-arid conditions. Biological Research, 47: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/0717-6287-47-71
Karbasi, M., & Arzani, K. (2021). Asian and European pear scion-rootstock interactions and Pyrodwarf rootstock root growth and distribution, in: Acta Horticulturae. International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS), Leuven, Belgium, pp. 63–68.
Liang, W., Dondini, L., De Franceschi, P., Paris, R., Sansavini, S., & Tartarini, S. (2015). Genetic diversity, population structure, and construction of a core collection of apple cultivars from Italian germplasm. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 33, 458-473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-014-0754-9
Maleki Asayesh, Z., Arzani, K., Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A., & Abdollahi, H. (2021). Macronutrients Uptake and Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency in Dargazi Seedling and Pyrodwarf Clonal Pear Rootstocks Under Drought Stress Conditions. Seed and Plant Journal, 37(4), 489-511. https://doi.org/10.22092/spj.2022.360009.1274 [In Persian].
Maleki Asayesh, Z.M., Arzani, K., Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A., & Abdollahi, H. (2023). Gas Exchanges and Physiological Responses Differ Among ‘Pyrodwarf’ Clonal and ‘Dargazi’ Seedling Pear (Pyrus communis L.) Rootstocks in Response to Drought Stress. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 23, 6469–6484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-023-01502-1
Marschner, P. (2012). Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic, London, p 651.
Martinez, H. E., de Souza, B. P., Caixeta, E. T., de Carvalho, F. P., & Clemente, J. M. (2020). Water deficit changes nitrate uptake and expression of some nitrogen-related genes in coffee plants (Coffea arabica L.). Scientia Horticulturae, 267: 109254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109254
Martins, A. L. C., Batagha, O.C., Camargo, O.A. & Conarella, H. (2003). Corn yield and uptake of Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn from sewage sludge-amend soil with and without liming. Revista-Basilica-Deciencia, 27, 563-574. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832003000300018
Raeisi Monfared, A., & Yavari, A. (2020). Study on nutrient elements in the soil and plants of some salvia santolinifolia natural habitats. Journal of Plant Process and Function, 9(39), pp. 215-229. [In Persian].
Rahnama, A., Khajavi, M., Meskarbashee, M., Moosavi, S. A, & Harrison M.T. (2026). Cytokinin modulates photosynthesis, antioxidant profiles and fatty acid composition in sunflower plants subjected to extreme heat stress. Plant Growth Regulation, 106, 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-025-01413-4
Rezaei, A., Abdollahi, H., Arzani, K., Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A., & Ahmadi, N. (2023a). Preliminary Selection of Different Species of Genus Pear (Pyrus) for Dwarfing and Nutrient Uptake. Seed and Plant Journal, 39(2), 282-253. https://doi.org/10.22092/spj.2024.364714.1347
Rezaei, A., Arzani, K., & Sarikhani, S. (2023b). The assessments of biochemical characteristics for the superior walnut (Juglans regia L.) genotypes. European Journal of Horticultural Science, 88(4), 1611-4434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-024-03358-7
Rezaei, A., Arzani, K., Abdollahi, H., Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A., & Ahmadi, N. (2025). Genotypic differences in morphological and physiological traits of the genus Pyrus and clonal pear rootstocks under prolonged drought stress. Scientia Horticulturae, 350, 114338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114338
Rufato, L., Da Silva, P. S., Kretzschmar, A. A., Bogo, A., De Macedo, T. A., Welter, J. F., Fazio, G., & Petry, D. (2021). Geneva® series rootstocks for apple trees under extreme replanting conditions in Southern Brazil. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 712162. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.712162
Salisbury, F.B. & Ross, C.W. (1992). Plant physiology (4th edition). Wadsworth Publishing Company, California, USA.
Sandeep, Dubey, A.K., Sharma, N., Awasthi, O.P., Sharma, R.M., & Dahuja, A. (2023). Genotypic differences in root architecture and physiological characteristics in mango (Mangifera indica) under drought. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 93, 868–874. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i8.138850
Shan, W., Liang, D., & Ma, F. (2014). Leaf micromorphology and sugar may contribute to differences in drought tolerance for two apple cultivars. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 80, 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.04.012
Sircelj, H., Tausz, M., Grill, D., & Batic, F. (2007). Detecting different levels of drought stress in apple trees (Malus domestica Borkh.) with selected biochemical and physiological parameters. Scientia Horticulturae, 113, 362-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2007.04.012
Tanguilig, V. C., Yambao, E. B., O’Toole, J. C., & De Datta, S. K. (1987). Water stress affects leaf elongation, leaf water potential, transpiration, and nutrient uptake of rice, maize, and soybean. Plant and Soil, 103, 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02370385
Tatari, M., Jafari, A., Shirmardi, M., & Mohamadi, M. (2020). Using morphological and physiological traits to evaluate drought tolerance of pear populations (Pyrus spp.). International Journal of Fruit Science. 20, 837–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2019.1697410
Teshome, D. T., Zharare, G. E., & Naidoo, S. (2020). The threat of the combined effect of biotic and abiotic stress factors in forestry under a changing climate. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 601009. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.601009
White, R. G., & Kirkegaard, J. A. (2010). The distribution and abundance of wheat roots in a dense, structured subsoil–implications for water uptake. Plant, cell & environment, 33(2), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02059.x
Xie, H., Li, M., Chen, Y., Zhou, Q., Liu, W., Liang, G., & Jia, Z. (2021). Important physiological changes due to drought stress on oat. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 644726. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.644726