تولیدات گیاهی

تولیدات گیاهی

بهینه‌سازی شرایط رشد گیاهچه‌های کشت بافتی گیاه ساکولنت هاورتیا شیشه‌ای (Haworthia cooperi)

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی - کشت بافت

نویسندگان
1 گروه پژوهشی بیوتکنولوژی گیاهان باغبانی، پژوهشکده بیوتکنولوژی صنعتی، سازمان جهاد دانشگاهی خراسان رضوی، مشهد، ایران
2 گروه بیوتکنولوژی و به‌نژادی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
چکیده
هاورتیا شیشه‌ای، یک گیاه ساکولنت بومی آفریقای جنوبی با برگ‌های گوشتی و نیمه‌شفاف است. این پژوهش به منظور بررسی پاسخ رشدی این گیاه به شرایط کشت خارج از محیط درون شیشه‌ای پس از کشت درون شیشه‌ای، در سال ۱۴۰۲ در آزمایشگاه کشت بافت پژوهشکده بیوتکنولوژی صنعتی جهاد دانشگاهی خراسان رضوی انجام شد. آزمایش به‌صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی و با پنج تکرار اجرا شد. گیاهچه‌های هاورتیا از طریق کشت بافت در محیط کشت پایة موراشیگ و اسکوگ (MS) حاوی 3 میلی‌گرم در لیتر  بنزیل آدنین (BA) و 0/5 میلی‌گرم در لیتر نفتالن‌استیک‌اسید (NAA) تکثیر و سپس در محیط کشت ½MS حاوی 1 میلی‌گرم در لیتر ایندول‌استیک‌اسید (IAA) ریشه‌دار شدند. پس از سازگاری در گلخانه، اثر سه نوع بستر کشت (پیت ماس همراه با پرلیت، کوکوپیت همراه با پرلیت و مخلوط ماسه، ورمی کمپوست و پرلیت) همراه با سه سطح آبیاری (اشباع، نیمه اشباع و خشک) بر صفات رشدی و فیزیولوژیک گیاه بررسی شد. نتایج بررسی نشان داد که بستر کشت کوکوپیت در شرایط آبیاری خشک عملکرد بهتری از نظر وزن تر اندام هوایی (17/9 گرم)، وزن خشک برگ (2/76 میلی‌گرم)، حجم اندام هوایی (16/3 سانتی‌متر مکعب)، سطح اندام هوایی (16/9سانتی‌متر مربع)، مقدار کلروفیل a (7/2 میلی‌گرم بر گرم وزن تر) و کاروتنوئیدها (1/7 میلی‌گرم بر گرم وزن تر) نشان داد و همچنین وزن تر ریشه (2/01 گرم) و وزن خشک ریشه (15/6 میلی‌گرم) نیز به شکل قابل توجهی بیشتر بود. این تفاوت‌ها در سطح آماری ۵ درصد معنی‌دار بوده و نشان‌دهندۀ توانایی بالای مخلوط کوکوپیت-پرلیت در حفظ رطوبت، هوادهی ریشه گیاه و سایر ویژگی‌های فیزیکوشیمیایی آن است که باعث رشد بهتر برگ‌ها و اندام هوایی می‌شود. در بستر پیت ماس، بیشترین تعداد برگ (14/8 عدد) در شرایط آبیاری نیمه‌اشباع مشاهده شد و همچنین بیشترین مقدار کلروفیل b (1/9 میلی‌گرم بر گرم وزن تر) تحت آبیاری اشباع تولید شد. این نتایج نشان‌دهندۀ اثر مثبت پیت ماس در شرایط خاص آبیاری است که می‌تواند به بهبود برخی ویژگی‌های فیزیولوژیک گیاه کمک کند. از سوی دیگر، بستر مخلوط در شرایط آبیاری خشک کمترین عملکرد را داشت، به‌طوری که کمترین وزن تر اندام هوایی (10/6 گرم)، وزن خشک برگ (53/1 میلی‌گرم)، حجم اندام هوایی (۸/۸ سانتی‌متر مکعب)، و سطح اندام هوایی (13/2 سانتی‌متر مربع) مشاهده شد. همچنین وزن تر ریشه (0/63 گرم) و وزن خشک ریشه (6/7 میلی‌گرم) نیز در این بستر به طور  قابل توجهی کاهش یافت. این نتایج نشان می‌دهد که تهویه ضعیف و دسترسی کمتر به اکسیژن در بستر مخلوط نمی‌تواند شرایط بهینه‌ای برای رشد گیاه هاورتیا شیشه‌ای فراهم کند. به‌طور کلی، نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که نوع بستر و میزان آبیاری تأثیر قابل توجهی بر رشد و سلامت هاورتیا شیشه‌ای دارد و بستر کوکوپیت+پرلیت تحت آبیاری خشک، به دلیل حفظ مناسب رطوبت و تهویه بهتر، گزینه‌ای مناسب برای بهبود رشد و کاهش پوسیدگی ریشه است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Optimization of growth conditions for in vitro-regenerated plantlets of cooper's haworthia (Haworthia cooperi)

نویسندگان English

Ahmad Sharifi 1
Zahra Sargazi Moghaddam 2
Maryam Moradian 1
Mahdiyeh Kharrazi 1
Azadeh Khadem 1
1 Department of Horticultural Plants Biotechnology, Research Institute for Industrial Biotechnology, Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR)-Khorasan Razavi Branch, Mashhad, Iran
2 Department of Biotechnology and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Cooper's haworthia (Haworthia cooperi), a succulent native to South Africa, is distinguished by its small, fleshy, and semi-transparent leaves forming a rosette shape. This plant is well-regarded among succulent enthusiasts for its attractive appearance and relatively easy-care requirements. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the growth response of cooper's haworthia under in vivo cultivation conditions following in vitro cultivation. In vitro propagation techniques offer a controlled environment to initiate growth, but transitioning plants to in vivo conditions is critical for their survival and subsequent development. Understanding the effects of different substrates and irrigation methods on this transition is essential for optimizing cultivation practices for cooper's haworthia and potentially other succulent species.
Materials and Methods
The experiment was designed as a factorial study, implemented using a completely randomized design with five replications to ensure the reliability and validity of the results. The initial propagation of plant samples was conducted in Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium, supplemented with 3 mg l-1 benzyladenine (BA) and 0.5 mg l-1 naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) to encourage robust shoot formation. Rooting was achieved in half-strength MS medium containing 1 mg l-1 indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), providing an optimal balance of nutrients and growth regulators for root development.
Following successful acclimatization in a greenhouse setting, the plants were subjected to various substrates and irrigation levels to assess their effects on growth and physiological characteristics. The substrates tested included peat moss-perlite, cocopeat-perlite, and a mixture of sand-vermicompost-perlite. These substrates were selected for their differing properties in terms of aeration, moisture retention, and nutrient availability. Irrigation treatments included saturated, semi-saturated, and dry conditions to mimic different moisture availability scenarios.
Results and Discussion
The results demonstrated that the cocopeat substrate under dry irrigation conditions provided the best overall growth performance. Plants cultivated in this medium exhibited the highest fresh shoot weight, dry leaf weight, shoot volume, and shoot surface area compared with the other treatments. In addition, these plants showed increased concentrations of carotenoids and chlorophyll a, indicating enhanced photosynthetic capacity and improved physiological status. Fresh and dry root weights were also significantly higher in the cocopeat substrate, highlighting its effectiveness in promoting both shoot and root development. In contrast, the peat moss substrate showed superior performance under semi-saturated irrigation conditions by producing the highest number of leaves. This finding suggests that peat moss may offer a favorable balance between moisture retention and root aeration, thereby supporting enhanced leaf proliferation. Furthermore, saturated irrigation conditions in the peat moss substrate led to the highest chlorophyll b content, indicating a positive response of the plant's photosynthetic machinery to high moisture levels. Conversely, the mixed substrate of sand-vermicompost-perlite demonstrated the lowest performance under dry irrigation conditions. Plants in this treatment had the lowest fresh shoot weight, dry leaf weight, shoot volume, and shoot surface area, likely due to poor aeration and limited oxygen availability. These conditions are less conducive to the growth of cooper's haworthia, highlighting the importance of selecting appropriate substrates that ensure adequate aeration and moisture retention. The superior performance of cocopeat under dry irrigation conditions can be attributed to its high moisture-retaining capacity and nutrient availability. These properties are crucial for the growth and development of succulent plants, which typically thrive in well-drained yet moisture-retentive substrates. The findings also highlighted the significant role of irrigation methods in influencing plant growth. Optimal irrigation practices can prevent issues such as root rot and improve water use efficiency, further enhancing plant health and productivity.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the critical impact of substrate and irrigation method on the growth and physiological characteristics of cooper's haworthia. The results suggest that cocopeat, due to its excellent moisture retention and nutrient provision capabilities, is the most suitable substrate for the optimal growth of this succulent. Additionally, adopting appropriate irrigation methods can significantly enhance plant performance and health. These findings have broader implications for horticultural practices, offering valuable insights for the cultivation of other succulent species. By selecting the right combination of substrate and irrigation, growers can ensure the successful adaptation and thriving of cooper's haworthia plants, paving the way for improved horticultural outcomes.







کلیدواژه‌ها English

Acclimatization
Chlorophyll concentration
Irrigation stress
Micropropagation
Morphophysiological traits
Adak, N., Tozlu, I., & Gubbuk, H. (2018). Influence of different soilless substrates to morpho-physiological characteristics and yield relations in strawberries. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 60(4), 341-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-018-0382-x
Afsharipour, S., Mirzaalian Dastjerdi, A., & Seyedi, A. (2022). The response of some growth and biochemical traits of cucumber seedlings in different culture mediums to wood vinegar foliar spraying. Journal of Plant Process and Function, 56(12), 393-406. http://jispp.iut.ac.ir/article-1-1857-en.html [In Persian].
Arellano-Ostoa, G., Lagunas-Santiago, S., Alvarez-Ruiz, M. A., Gutiérrez, E. V., & Martínez, R. R. (2019). In vitro multiplication and rooting of Echeveria pumila Lem. free of phytoplasmas. Paper presented at the IX International Symposium on New Ornamental Crops, 1288. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1288.29.
Arnon, D. I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 24(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1 
Aydi, S., Sassi Aydi, S., Marsit, A., El Abed, N., Rahmani, R., Bouajila, J., Merah, O. & Abdelly, C. (2023). Optimizing alternative substrate for tomato production in arid zone: lesson from growth, water relations, chlorophyll fluorescence, and photosynthesis. Plants, 12(7), 1457. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12071457
Baruah, T. C., & Borthakur, H. P. (1997). Soil Chemistry. Baruah, TC, Borthakur, HP. A Textbook of Soil Analysis. Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 118-132.
Brouwer, E., Denys, L., Lucassen, E., & Onkelinx, T. (2017). Competitive strength of Australian swamp stonecrop (Crassula helmsii) invading moorland pools. Aquatic Invasions. 12(3), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2017.12.3.06   
Chen, J., Henny, R. J., & McConnell, D. B. (2002). Development of new foliage plant cultivars. Trends In New Crops and New Uses, 36, 466-472.
Datt, B. (1998). Remote sensing of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a+b, and total carotenoid content in eucalyptus leaves. Remote Sensing of Environment, 66(2), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00046-7
Din, E. (2012). Soil Improvers and growing media–Determination of physical properties–Drybulk density, air volume, water volume, shrinkage value and total pore space. German Version prEN,Beuth, Berlin/Cologne.
Ebrahimi, R., Ebrahimi, F., & Ahmadizadeh, M. (2012). Effect of different substrates on herbaceous pigments and chlorophyll amount of strawberry in hydroponic cultivation system. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 12, 154-158.‌
Emming, J. (2023). Landscaping with large succulents: a watering guide for ocotillos, cacti, and yuccas part one: general information, and tips regarding ocotillos. Cactus and Succulent Journal, 95(1), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.2985/015.095.0110
Eshaghi, T., Zare Mehrjerdi, & M., Sharifi, A. (2020). Effect of medium, iron-chelating agent and plant growth regulator on micropropagation of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Plant Productions, 43(2), 309-322.  https://doi.org/10.22055/ppd.2019.27232.1655 [In Persian].
Faraji, H. (2017). Evaluation relationships between seed number, used water in evapotranspiration and leaf relative water content with canola seed weight. Journal of Crops Improvement, 17(1), 257-270. https://jci.ut.ac.ir/article_54805_7398.html [In Persian].
Gallegos, J., Álvaro, J. E., & Urrestarazu, M. (2020). Container design affects shoot and root growth of vegetable plant. HortScience, 55(6), 787-794. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14954-20
Garg, J., & Kumar, A. (2012). Effect of different soil types on growth and productivity of Euphorbia lathyris L. A hydrocarbon yielding plant. International Journal of Life Science and Pharma Research, 2, 164-173. http://ijlpr.com/admin/php/uploads/114_pdf.pdf
Griffiths, H., & Males, J. (2017). Succulent plants. Current Biology, 27(17), R890-R896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.021
Gungor, F., & Yildirim, E. (2013). Effect of different growing media on quality, growth and yield of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) under greenhouse conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 45(5), 1605-1608.
Hammo, Y. H. (2023). Effect of NPK fertilizer and growing media on the growth and gel production of two species of Aloe plant (Aloe Vera and Aloe Butteneri). Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture, 51(3), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.33899/magrj.2023.139367.1226
Heydari, K., & Kiani, S. (2021). Effect of seed bed on germination and seedling growth of Sea Squill (Drimia maritima L.). Journal of Seed Research, 11(1), 46-56. [In Persian].
Hodge, A., Berta, G., Doussan, C., Merchan, F., & Crespi, M. (2009). Plant root growth, architecture and function. Plant Soil, 321, 153–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9929-9
Huang, S., & Yu, S. (2022). Effect of water saturation on the strength of sandstones: experimental investigation and statistical analysis. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 81(8), 323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02822-9
Jafari Haghighi, M. (2003). Analytical methods of soil and the important physical and chemical sampling and analysis, with emphasis on theory and application. Nedaye zoha Publication, 236 p.
John, S., Sankar, M., Sreelatha, U., Kumar, K. A., & Deepthy, K. (2020). Morphological and floral characters of rose as influenced by growing media and growth regulators. Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 58(1).
Joy, Y. S., Lee, A. Y., & Park, S.-A. (2020). A horticultural therapy program focused on succulent cultivation for the vocational rehabilitation training of individuals with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041303
Kalaivani, K., & Jawaharlal, M. (2019). Study on physical characterization of coco peat with different proportions of organic amendments for soilless cultivation. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(3), 2283-2286.
Kang, J., Peng, Y., & Xu, W. (2022). Crop root responses to drought stress: Molecular mechanisms, nutrient regulations, and interactions with microorganisms in the rhizosphere. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(16), 9310. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169310
Kaur, A., Dubey, R., & Singh, S. (2015). Effect of different potting media on growth and flowering of kalanchoe (Kalanchoe blossfeldiana Poelln.). Indian Journal of Horticulture, 72(3), 388-391. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2015.00075.4
Khalaj, M. A., Amiri, M., & Sindhu, S. (2015). Study on the effect of different growing media on the growth and yield of gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii L.). Journal of Ornamental Plants, 1(3), 185-189.
Khalaj, M. A., Azimi, M., & Yousefbiki, A. (2023). Effect of different growing media on morpho-physiological, biochemical and nutrient uptake characteristics of Amaryllis (Hippeastrum spp.) under vegetative growth period. Plant Productions, 45(4), 519-531. https://doi.org/10.22055/ppd.2023.42479.2066 [In Persian].
Kharrazi, M., Moradian, M., Safari, N., Khadem, A., & Sharifi, A. (2022). Optimization of in vitro cultural conditions of Haworthia (Haworthia cooperi Baker). Plant Productions, 45(1), 53-66. doi:10.22055/ppd.2021.36744.1971.  https://doi.org/10.22055/PPD.2021.36744.1971 [In Persian].
Kitir, N., Yildirim, E., Şahin, Ü., Turan, M., Ekinci, M., Ors, S., Kul, R., Ünlü, H. and Ünlü, H. (2018). Peat use in horticulture (pp. 75-90). London, UK: IntechOpen.
Kowalczyk, K., Mirgos, M., Bączek, K., Niedzińska, M., & Gajewski, M. (2014). Effect of different growing media in hydroponic culture on the yield and biological quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. capitata). Paper presented at the VI Balkan Symposium on Vegetables and Potatoes, 1142. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1142.17
Krawczyk, A., Domagała-Świątkiewicz, I., & Lis-Krzyścin, A. (2021). Time-dependent changes in the physico-chemical parameters and growth responses of Sedum acre (L.) to waste-based growing substrates in simulation extensive green roof experiment. Agronomy, 11(2), 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020298
Lee, J. H., Lim, Y. S., & Nam, S. Y. (2021). Optimization of shading levels, potting media, and fertilization rates on the vegetative growth of Sedum zokuriense Nakai. Flower Research Journal, 29(4), 239-246. https://doi.org/10.11623/frj.2021.29.4.04
Luo, D., Xie, Y., Lu, S., & Su, G. (2022). Experimental study on the effects of water saturation on the microseismic and acoustic emission characteristics of sandstone in different stress states. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 55(11), 6583-6603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-03001-8
Ma, G., Mao, H., Bu, Q., Han, L., Shabbir, A., & Gao, F. (2020). Effect of compound biochar substrate on the root growth of cucumber plug seedlings. Agronomy, 10(8), 1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081080
Madhavi, B. G. K., Khan, F., Bhujel, A., Jaihuni, M., Kim, N. E., Moon, B. E., & Kim, H. T. (2021). Influence of different growing media on the growth and development of strawberry plants. Heliyon, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07170
Mazhari, R. (2023). Investigating the effect of different planting substrates on the some of the morphological and physiological characteristics of the german chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla) under salt stress. Applied Soil Research, 11(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.30466/asr.2023.121370 [In Persian].
Meng, F., Xiang, D., Zhu, J., Li, Y., & Mao, C. (2019). Molecular mechanisms of root development in rice. Rice, 12(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-018-0262-x
Molefe, Rebaona R., Adenike E. Amoo, and Olubukola O. Babalola (2023). Communication between plant roots and the soil microbiome; involvement in plant growth and development. Symbiosis, 90(3), 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-023-00941-9
Nerlich, A., & Dannehl, D. (2021). Soilless cultivation: dynamically changing chemical properties and physical conditions of organic substrates influence the plant phenotype of lettuce. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 601455. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.601455
Olkova, A. (2022). Advantages of using peat gel to reduce the toxicity of soils polluted with oil products. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(5), 3481-3490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-03971-w
Park, M. S., Kim, H. C., An, S., Lee, C. W., & Choi, J. M. (2021). Influence of pre-plant root substrate nitrogen levels on growth of selected fruit bearing vegetable seedlings in cylindrical paper pots. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 62, 367-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-020-00327-6
Pirzad, A., Shakiba, M. R., Zehtab-Salmasi, S., Mohammadi, S. A., Darvishzadeh, R., & Samadi, A. (2011). Effect of water stress on leaf relative water content, chlorophyll, proline and soluble carbohydrates in Matricaria chamomilla L. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 5(12), 2483-2488.
Pourkhaloee, A., Khosh-Khui, M., & Barba-Gonzalez, R. (2023). Somatic embryogenesis of tuberose (Agave amica L.) was improved by milk as a potential biostimulant in plant tissue culture. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology, 10(3), 257-268. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijhst.2022.330660.504
Prisa, D., & Caro, S. (2023). Alternative substrates in the cultivation of ornamental and vegetable plants. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 24(1), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2023.24.1.0268
Qi, H., Zhang, S., Song, C., Sun, Z., & Zhai, X. (2009). Effects of different substrates and watering modes on physicochemical properties of substrate and ornamental quality of Euphorbia pulcherrima. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 18(3), 74-80.
Ren, M., Li, Y., Zhu, J., Zhao, K., Wu, Z., & Mao, C. (2023). Phenotypes and molecular mechanisms underlying the root response to phosphate deprivation in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(6), 5107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065107v
Shaban, A. S., Safhi, F. A., Fakhr, M. A., Pruthi, R., Abozahra, M. S., El-Tahan, A. M., & Subudhi, P. K. (2023). Comparison of the morpho-physiological and molecular responses to salinity and alkalinity stresses in rice. Plants, 13(1), 60.