Plant Productions

Plant Productions

Influence of pruning on canopy light penetration, flowering, fruit set, and fruit quality attributes of Thomson Navel orange in northern Iran

Document Type : Research Paper - Tropical and Subtropical Fruits

Authors
Department of Horticulture Sciences, Faculty of Crop Sciences, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran
Abstract
Introduction
Thomson navel orange occupies the largest cultivation area among citrus species in eastern Mazandaran owing to its high adaptability and yield potential. In northern regions, trees are commonly trained to a spherical canopy form. However, this structure restricts light penetration into the inner canopy due to shading by upper branches and leaves, thereby confining flowering and fruiting largely to the shape of canopy. The present study aimed to enhance light penetration into the inner canopy through pruning and to assess its effects on flowering and selected quantitative and qualitative traits of Thomson navel orange fruit.
Materials and Methods
The experiment was conducted during the 2019–2020 growing season in a commercial orchard located in the Mushk-Abad area of Jouybar. A randomized complete block design with seven treatments and three replications was employed. Light intensity within the canopy under different pruning treatments was measured at 09:00, 12:00, and 15:00. Additionally, the number of flowers, number of leafy inflorescences, and fruit traits including number, length, diameter, volume, and color were recorded.
Results and Discussion
Pruning treatments significantly affected light distribution within the canopy. The highest light penetration into the inner canopy was recorded in pruning type F (open-center pruning combined with removal of branches from the east, west, and south sides), with a mean of 453 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹, followed by type E (open-center pruning with removal from the west and south sides) at 365 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹. The lowest value (12.7 µmol m⁻².s⁻¹) was observed in the control (type A: unpruned spherical canopy). The highest mean number of flowers (270) was obtained in pruning type F, whereas the lowest values (216–218 flowers) were observed in treatments A and G (open-center pruning with removal from the south side). A similar trend was observed for the number of leafy inflorescences, with the highest values recorded in type F. This treatment also exerted a positive effect on fruit traits, including length, weight, and volume. Fruit set percentage was highest in type F (15.4%) and lowest in type B (open-center pruning) at 3.2%. The greatest number of fruits was observed in type F (14 fruits), followed by type E (12.33 fruits), whereas the lowest values were recorded in the control (type A) and type B treatments. Overall, pruning type F, which maximized light penetration into the canopy, enhanced flowering and fruiting within the inner canopy and improved both quantitative and qualitative fruit characteristics.
Conclusion
Enhanced light availability within the inner canopy promotes flower formation, development of leafy inflorescences, and fruit set in Thomson navel orange trees. Moreover, improved light distribution positively influences fruit physical attributes, including length, diameter, weight, and color. Therefore, the adoption of appropriate pruning strategies—particularly pruning type F—is recommended to achieve optimal yield and superior fruit quality.
Keywords
Subjects

Abobatta, W. F. (2019). Citrus varieties in Egypt: An impression. International Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 1, 63-66. http://scirange.com/pdf/irjas.2019.63.66.pdf
Akhlaghi Amiri, N., Asadi Kangarshahi, A. & Mahdavi Reykandeh, J. (2016). Investigation of flower and fruit set in some citrus varieties in east of Mazandaran climate. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 47(2), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijhs.2016.58525 [In Persian].
Asadi Kangarshahi, A. (2021). Investigation of zinc status and management of zinc sulfate application for citrus in calcareous soils of East Mazandaran. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production, 11(3), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.22069/ejsms.2021.18568.1990 [In Persian].
Asadi Kangarshahi, A. A., Savaghebi, G., & Amiri, N. A. (2012). Alleviation of alternate bearing in Satsuma mandarin by nitrogen management and pruning in East Mazandaran Province. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 42(3), 217–225. http://journals.ut.ac.ir/page/articleframe.html?articleId=669600 [In Persian].
Bera, M., Ghosh, G. K., Mondal, S., Biswas, P. K., & Kundu, M. C. (2019). Yield of Boro rice as influenced by integrated nutrient management in lateritic soils of West Bengal, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8(1), 1743–1754. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.801.185
Brar, J. S., Thakur, A. T., & Arora, N. K. (2007). Effect of pruning intensity on fruit yield and quality of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Sardar. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 36(1–2), 65–66. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20093252948
De Casas, R. R., Vargas, P., Pérez-Corona, E., Manrique, E., García-Verdugo, C., & Balaguer, L. (2011). Sun and shade leaves of Olea europaea respond differently to plant size, light availability and genetic variation. Functional Ecology, 25(4), 802–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01851.x
Ehtesham Nia, A., Taghipour, S., & Siahmansour, S. (2022). Putrescine with Aloe vera gel coating improves bioactive compounds and quality of table grapes under cold storage. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 59(10), 4085-4096. https://doi .org/10.1007/s13197-022-05461-w
Hamdy, A. E. (2018). Effect of pruning severity on yield and fruit quality of ‘Murcott’ and ‘Fremont’ mandarin. Acta Horticulturae, 1216, 85–89. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1216.17
Hanke, M. V., Flachowsky, H., Peil, A., & Hättasch, C. (2007). No flower no fruit-genetic potentials to trigger flowering in fruit trees. Genes, Genomes and Genomics, 1(1), 1–20. http://www.globalsciencebooks.info/
Hardy, S., Barkley, P., Treeby, M. T., Smith, M. W., & Sanderson, G. (2017). Australian mandarin production manual. NSW Government.
Iglesias, D. J., Cercós, M., Colmenero-Flores, J. M., Naranjo, M. A., Ríos, G., Carrera, E., Ruiz-Rivero, O., Lliso, I., Morillon, R., & Tadeo, F. R. (2007). Physiology of citrus fruiting. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 19(4), 333-362.‏ https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202007000400006
Kavousi, B., & Hassanpour, B. (2018). Effect of branching time and pre-harvest irrigation on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Asgar grapes. Journal of Agricultural Crop Production, 41, 1. https://doi.org/10.22055/ppd.2018.13552 [In Persian].
Li, T., & Yang, Q. (2015). Advantages of diffuse light for horticultural production and perspectives for further research. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 704. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00704
Marini, R. P., Sherif, S. M., & Smith, A. H. (2020). Physiology of pruning fruit trees. Virginia Tech. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/100448
Ministry of Agriculture Jehad. (2024). Department of Planning and Economic, Office of Statistics and Information Technology. Tehran, Iran. https://agrodl.ir/statistics/
Paradiso, R., & Proietti, S. (2022). Light-quality manipulation to control plant growth and photomorphogenesis in greenhouse horticulture. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 41(2), 742–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10337-y
Umar, M., Ahmad, S., Haider, S. T. A., & Naz, S. (2019). Effect of pruning to improve yield and fruit quality of ‘Kinnow’ mandarin plants under high density plantation. Journal of Horticultural Science & Technology, 2(3), 85–89 https://doi.org/10.46653/jhst190203085
Zhang, J., Serra, S., Leisso, R. S., & Musacchi, S. (2016). Effect of light microclimate on the quality of ‘d’Anjou’ pears in mature open-centre tree architecture. Biosystems Engineering, 141, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.11.002