Plant Productions

Plant Productions

Response of super sweet corn cultivars to planting date for traits related to grain and ear yields and industrial processing

Document Type : Research Paper - Agronomy

Authors
Mehdi Mottaghi 1
Alireza Yazdanpanah 2
1 Assistant Professor, Horticulture Crops Research Department, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Hamedan, Iran
2 Academic Researcher, Soil and Water Research Department, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Hamedan, Iran
10.22055/ppd.2025.48288.2226
Abstract
Introduction
The limited availability of groundwater in Hamedan Province, along with the short growth period and lower water requirements of sweet corn varieties (compared to late-maturing grain corn), has encouraged the expansion of sweet corn cultivation in the region. The super sweet corn produced in Hamedan is considered one of the most suitable in Iran for industrial processing such as canning or freezing, due to the region’s favorable summer climate – characterized by warm days and moderate nights-which contributes to a high grain extraction percentage from green ears. Planting date significantly affects the phenological development of super sweet corn, thereby affecting the yield components and ultimately the grain and green ear yields. This study aims to evaluate the effects of different planting dates on the phenological and agronomic traits of various super sweet corn cultivars, with a focus on grain and green ear yields as well as their suitability for industrial food processing.
Materials and Methods
A two-year field experiment (2020-2021 and 2021-2022) was conducted at Ekbatan Station of Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center in Hamedan province, Iran. The experimental design was a split-plot arrangement. Planting dates (9 May, 4 June, and 30 June) were assigned to the main plots, while cultivars (Basin, Messenger, Sheba, Passion and Shaker) were allocated to the subplots. At harvest time (milky grain stage), the green ear yield per unit area was recorded. After separating the grain from the cob, the canned grain yield and the grain-to-green ear weight ratio (percentage of grain extraction) were calculated. In addition, the percentage of Total Soluble Solids (TSS) in the grain was measured using a refractometer. A combined analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed across the two years, and the effects of planting date and cultivar on the mean of each trait were compared using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at the 5 % probability level.
Results and Discussion
According to the results, the highest values of Growth Degree Day (GDD) to pollination were observed in the cultivars Shaker (713.4 °C), Messenger (698.2 °C) and Basin (688.7 °C).  Among the planting dates, the earliest date (9 May) recorded the highest GDD to pollination with 708.5 °C. However, the highest GDD values ​​ to ear harvest were observed from the 4 June planting date. In this planting time, the cultivars Messenger, Shakar and Basin demonstrated superior performance with 1212 °C, 1195 °C and 1162 °C, respectively. Regarding the number of rows per ear, the second planting date (4 June) showed a significant advantage with an average of 15.17 rows, outperforming the other planting dates. Among the cultivars, Messenger (14.95), Shaker (14.74), and Basin (14.59) exhibited significantly higher values than the others. Similarly, in terms of the number of grains per row, ​all cultivars achieved their highest values under the second planting date. The Basin cultivar was significantly superior with 44.58 grains per row. The high values for both the number of ear rows and grains per row - key components of grain yield – contributed to the Basin cultivar achieving the highest green ear and grain yields (38854 and 15922 kg ha-1, respectively) under the second planting date. Additionally, the highest TSS content (23.11%) was recorded under the third planting date (30 June), although this value was not significantly different from that of the second planting date (22.32%). Among cultivars, Messenger (24.37), Sheba (22.38) and Basin (22.17%) showed significant superiority in TSS content compared to the other cultivars.
Conclusion
In the Hamedan region, where late spring and early autumn frosts are common, selecting an appropriate planting date for sweet corn is crucial. Based on the results, the most suitable planting period for super sweet corn in Hamedan province is the first ten days of June. Delaying planting until the third ten-day period of June is not recommended, as it leads to a significant reduction in both green ear and grain yields. Furthermore, due to its high green ear and grain yields, along with acceptable levels ​​of TSS content, the Basin cultivar is recommended for cultivation in Hamedan and other areas with similar climatic conditions.
 
Keywords
Growing degree-day
Industrial processing
Planting date
Super sweet corn
Subjects
Agha Alikhani, M., & Mohammadi, K.H. (2019). Sweet corn, agronomic and genetic approaches. Tarbit Modares University Press, Mashhad, Iran, 391 pp. [In Persian]
Alan, O., Kinaci, G., Kinaci, E., Bascigtcl, Z.B., Sonmez, K., Evrenosoglu, Y., & Kutlu, I. (2014). Kernel quality of some sweet corn varieties in relation to processing. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici, 42 (2), 414- 419.
ASEAN Standards. (2012). ASEAN standards for horticultural produce and other food crops. Standard for sweet corn, ASEAN Stan 28, The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).
Attar Roshan, M., Rahnama, A., Meskarbashee, M., Siahpoosh, M.R., & Harrison, M. (2024). Study of phenological, physiological, and yield responses of indehiscent and dehiscent sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) cultivars to sowing dates in Dezful, Iran. Plant Productions, 47(4), 523-542. [In Persian]
Choukan, R. (2012). Maize and maize properties. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO) Press, Tehran, Iran. 427 pp. [In Persian]
Didgah, S.K., Farajee, H., & Yadavi, A. (2012). Effect of plant density on ear yield and forage protein of four sweet corn hybrids in Yasouj. Plant Production, 35(2), 77-84. [In Persian]
Haqhbin, F., Khavari Khorasani, S., & Hakim Attar, B. (2014). Agronomy and industrial processing of sweet corn and baby corn. Agricultural and Natural Resources Education Research Press (TAC), Tehran, Iran, 174 pp [In Persian]
Ibrahim, A. I., & Alfauomy, G.A. (2019). Evaluation of some sweet corn hybrids for agronomic traits and technological parameters under different planting dates. Journal of Food Sciences (Suez Canal University), 6*(1), 49-63.
Jafari, A., Bihamta, M. R., Moghbel, M., Soufizadeh, S., Bazgeer, S., & Karimi, M. (2024). Effect of planting date and cultivar on growth stages, morphological traits and growth indices of corn in Karaj city. Journal of Crops Improvement, 26(1), 17-34. [In Persian]
Kara, B. (2011). Fresh ear yield and growing degree-days of sweet corn in different sowing dates in Southwestern Anatolia region. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 16(2), 166-171.
Khan, Z.H., Khalil, S.K., Ali, F., Islam, B., Iqbal, A., Ullah, I., Ali, M., & Shah, F. (2018). Variations in planting dates of sweet corn affect it agronomic traits via altering crop micro-environment. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 27(7), 4822–4829.
Khavari Khorasani, S. (2020). Practical guide to sweet corn production. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO) Press, Tehran, Iran. 78 pp. [In Persian]
Kumari, J., Gadag, R. N., & Jha, G. K. (2006). Heritability and correlation studies in sweet corn for quality traits, field emergence and grain yield. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter, 80, 18-22.
Lertrat, K., & Pulam, T. (2007). Breeding for increased sweetness in sweet corn. International Journal of Plant Breeding, 1(1), 27-30.
Majidian, M., & Esfahani, M. (2013). Effect of sowing date on yield and some agronomic traits of six forage maize hybrids under Guilan agro-climatic conditions. Journal of Crop production and processing, 3(9), 57-70. [In Persian]
Manouri, A.A., Mosavat, S.A., Taji, M., & Ghouchzadeh, A. (2020). Investigating the yield and yield components of ear and fodder of different sweet corn hybrids in two planting dates. Applied Research of Plant Ecophysiology, 6(1), 37-48. [In Persian]
Mohamad Zade, H., Asghari, J., Farajee, H., Moradi, A., & Majidian, M. (2020). Effect of planting date and sowing methods on ear yield, water use efficiency and some physiological characteristics of sweet corn. Crop Production and Processing, 9(4), 97-112. [In Persian]
Mottaghi, M. (2020). Sweet corn, a plant with a short growth period and low water consumption. Moravej, 3(2), 26-32. [In Persian]
Oktem. A., Oktem, A. G., & Coskun, Y. (2004). Determination of sowing data of sweet corn (zea mays L. Saccharata) under sanliurfa conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 28(2), 83-91.
Pinjari, S., & Chavan., S. (2017). Cultivation technology of sweet corn. LAMBERT Academic Publishing Press, Balti, Republic of Moldova, 230 pp.
Rahnama, A. (2012). Crop loss assessment and canola (Brassica napus L.) impact factor analysis in late planting. Plant Productions, 35(3), 17-25. [In Persian]
Revilla, P., Anibas, C.M., & Tracy, W.F. (2021). Sweet Corn Research around the World 2015–2020. Agronomy, 11 (3), 1-49.
Salehi, F., Rahnama, A., Meskarbashee, M., Mehdi Khanlou, K., & Ghorbanpour, M. (2023). Physiological and metabolic changes of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars in response to terminal heat stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 42, 6585-6600.
Shoushi Dezfuli, A.A., Khorramian, M., & Assareh, A. (2019). Effect of sowing and irrigation cutoff date on seed yield and irrigation water use efficiency of spring berseem clover in Khouzestan. Plant Productions, 41(4), 69-82. [In Persian]
Szymanek, M. (2012). Processing of sweet corn, trends in vital food and control engineering. Ayman Amer Eissa (Ed.). InTech prass, 85-98 pp.
Ugur, A., & Maden, H. A. (2015). Sowing and planting period on yield and ear quality of sweet corn (Zea mays L. Saccharata). Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 39(1), 48-57.
Vafa, P., Barary, M., Darkhal, H., & Naseri, R. (2014). Thermal requirement and the response of corn hybrids (Zea mays L.) to different planting dates in Isfahan. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 8(2), 121-136. [In Persian]
Plant Productions
Volume 48, Issue 2
Spring 2025
Pages 247-263