Plant Productions

Plant Productions

Evaluation of yield stability of flue cured tobaccos using some univariate and multivariate stability statistics

Document Type : Research Paper - Horticulture

Authors
Naghi Hosseinzadeh Fashalami 1
Roghayeh Aminian 2
Habibollah Samizadeh 3
1 Ph. D Student, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding. Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Imam Khomeini International University. Qazvin. Iran.
3 Professor, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
10.22055/ppd.2022.40945.2037
Abstract
Introduction
The genotype × environment interaction is one of the most important factors in limiting breeding programs. The compatibility of a given genotype determines its ability and genetic capacity to produce high production and yield stability in different environments. Therefore, it is necessary to study the genotype × environment interaction in order to introduce stable genotypes in different environments. The current research was carried out to determine the compatibility and stability of yield for 10 tobacco genotypes and estimate the most stable genotype for tobacco growing areas in Iran (i.e. Guilan, Mazandaran and Golestan provinces).
 
Materials and Methods
In this study, 10 male sterile flue cured tobacco genotypes, which they completely tested in terms of quality and taste, including 7 internal modified hybrids named RVH5, RVH6, RVH8, RVH27, RVH30, RVH48, RVH70 along with 3 imported genotype DVH2101, PVH19 and NC100 in 6 tobacco growing regions of Guilan, Mazandaran and Golestan in two years of experiment (2018-2019). In total, 12 environments were studied in a randomized complete block design with 3 replications. Combined analysis was performed by considering the environments as a random factor and genotypes as a fixed factor. Then the stability analysis of genotypes was done by 10 stability statistics and the first 3 components of AMMI (Additive Main effects and Multiplication Interaction) analysis including IPCA1, IPCA2 and IPCA3. Analysis of variance was done using SAS.9 software, AMMI analysis and related graphs were performed using IRRISTAT software.
 
Results and Discussion
The results of combined analysis of variance showed that the effect of location and year × location interaction, the effect of genotype and genotype × year × location interaction were significant at the 1% probability level for yield. Genotype × environment interaction analysis using the first three main components of the AMMI analysis justified 69.47% of the total variance. The lowest coefficient of variation was related to DVH2101 and RVH27 genotypes. RVH30, RVH27 and RVH8 genotypes were selected as the most stable genotypes. According to Rick equivalence and Shoklaʹs stability variance parameters. The least squares deviation from the regression line were related to RVH27, RVH30 and RVH8 genotypes. In terms of regression coefficient, RVH27, RVH30 and DVH2101 genotypes had a line slope close to 1. Based on the coefficient of determination and Jenkins and Perkins statistics, RVH27, RVH30 and RVH8 genotypes were in the same rank in terms of stability. RVH27 and RVH30 were the most stable genotypes with superiority index. RVH27, RVH30 and DVH2101 genotypes were selected as the most stable hybrids based on the AMMI first model due to their proximity to the plot center, low interaction and high yield. Based on the second model of AMMI analysis, RVH27 and DVH2101 genotypes were selected as stable genotypes. In the third AMMI model, the RVH27 genotype was selected as the stable genotype due to its closeness to the biplot center and high yield.
 
Conclusion
Considering most of the stability statistics and AMMI analysis, the most stable genotype was RVH27 hybrid. RVH30 and DVH2101 hybrids were placed in the next categories of stability. In addition, genotypes RVH6 and NC100 showed high private compatibility to Tirtash tobacco growing area and genotype RVH27 to Rasht region.
Keywords
AMMI analysis
Biplot
Genotype × environment interaction
Main components
Subjects
Ahmadi, J., Vaezi, B., & Naraki, H. (2013). Analysis of canola stability in rain-fed conditions and comparison of stable genotypes selection methods using stability indices. Plant Production, 36 (2), 13-22. [In Persian].
Ahmadi, M., Omidi, M., Alizadeh, B., & ShahNejat Bushehri, A. K. (2021). Evaluation of adaptation and sustainability of winter oilseed rape mutant lines in cold and mild cold region of iran by GGE biplot method. Plant Production, 44 (3), 345-356. [In Persian].
Alavi, R., & Namvar Rezaee, A. (2009). Investigation of yield stability and adaptability of tobacco air- cured CMS lines in west Azarbayjan and Kordestan provinces. Annual Report of Urmia Research Center, Pp 47-61. [In Persian].
Chaplin, J. (1975). Genetic influence on chemical constituents of tobacco leaf and smoke. Beiträge
zur Tabakforschung/Contributions to Tobacco Research, 8(4), 233-240.
Darvishzadeh, R., Alavi, R. & Sarrafi, A. (2010). Resistance to Powdery Mildew (Erysiphe
cichoracearum DC.) in oriental and semi-oriental tobacco germplasm under field conditions. Journal
of Crop Improvement, 24 (2), 122-130.
Gauch, H. G.1992. Statistical analysis of regional trials. AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Press.
Gauch, H. G., & Zobel, R. W., (1996). AMMI analysis of yield trails. Boca Raton, Florida, Pp. 85-122.
Gotami, Sh. (2021). stability and adaptability of new tobacco varieties to their growing areas under rain fed conditions in Zimbabwe. Agricultural science digest, pp. 1-4.
Gravos, K. A., Moldenhauer, A. K., & Rohaman, P. C. (1991). Genetic and genotype environment effects for rough rice and head rice yield. Crop Science, 31 (4): 907-991.
Hosseinzadeh Fashalami, N. (2008). Investigation of quantitative and qualitative traits.of several tobacco sun cured varieties. Annual Report of Tirtash Research and Education Center. Pp 41-49. [In Persian].
Hosseinzadeh Fashalami, N., Abbasi Rostami, H., Mahdavi, A. R., & Gholizadeh, A. (2016). Regional mean comparison several tobacco air- cured CMS lines varieties in Mazandaran and Golestan provinces. 1st international and 13th Iranian crop science congress and 3rd Iranian seed science and technology conference. Iran, Karaj. Pp1-4. [In Persian].
Hosseinzadeh Fashalami, N., & M.ahdavi, A. R. (2009). Investigation of yield stability and adaptability of tobacco flue- cured CMS varieties in Mazandaran and Golestan provinces. Annual Report of Tirtash Research and Education Center. Pp47-60. [In Persian].
Hosseinzadeh Fashalami, N., & Mahdavi, A. R. (2009). Investigation of yield stability and adaptability of tobacco air- cured CMS varieties in Mazandaran and Golestan provinces. Annual Report of Tirtash Research and Education Center. Pp 61-75. [In Persian].
Hosseinzadeh Fashalami, N., Mahdavi, A. R., Alinejhad, R., & Moarefzadeh, N. (2016). Investigation of yield stability and adaptability of tobacco air- cured CMS varieties in Mazandaran and Golestan provinces. 1st international and 13th Iranian crop science congress and 3rd Iranian seed science and technology conference. Iran, Karaj. Pp1-4. [In Persian].
Li, G., Xiao, H., & Fang, H. (2001). Analysis on stability of the main economic characters of flue cured tobacco cultivars. Acta Tabacaria, 7-1, ISSN.1004-5708, p.13-8.
Lin, C. S., Binns, M. R., & Lef Kovith, L. P., (1986). Stability analysis, where do we stand? Crop Science, 26: 894-900.
Lorencetti, C., Santos, M., Mallmann, I. L., Jackishch, R. M., Rovedder, j. H., & Paniz, C. (2007). Adaptability and stability of burlet varieties in Brazil. Coresta Meeting, Agro-Phyto Groups, Krakow, APPOST 05.
Mokhtarifar, Kh., Abdolshahi, R., & Pour Seyyedy, Sh. (2016). Yield stability analysis of eight bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars in Kerman province condition. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8 (17), 96-103. [In Persian].
Motzo, R., Guinta, F., & Deidda, M. (1962). Factors affecting the genotype × environment interaction in spring triticale grown in Mediterranean environment. Euphytica, 121: 317-324.
Sadeghi, S. M., Samizadeh, H., Amiri, E., & Ashouri, M. (2011). Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions (AMMI) analysis of dry leaf yield in tobacco hybrids across environments. African Jornal of Biotechnology, 10 (2), 4358-4364.
Sadeghi, S. M., & Samizadeh, H. (2011). Evaluation of yield stability of Virginia tobacco hybrids using stability parameters and pattern analysis via AMMI model. Journal of Crop Production, 4 (2), 103-119. [In Persian].
Salavati, R., & Hosseinzadeh Fashalami, N. (2010). Investigation of yield stability and adaptability of tobacco flue- cured CMS lines in Mazandaran and Golestan provinces. Annual Report of Tirtash Research and Education Center. Pp 89-104. [In Persian].
Semwal, D., Mishra, S., Chauhan, A., & Semwal, B. (2015). Adverse health effects of tobacco and role of ayurveda in their reduction. Journal of Medicinal Science, 15 (3): 139-146
Shadpour, S. (2011). Investigation of yield stability and adaptability of breeding tobacco flue- cured lines tolerant to PVY diseases.  M.Sc. Thesis of plant breeding, Islamic Azad University, Karaj. 155 p. [In Persian].
Shadpour,S., Peyghambari, S. A., Mohammadi, A., Shoaie Deylami, M., Jahromi, M. H. M., & Mahdavi, A. R. (2011). Study of genotype × environment interaction and yield stability of tobacco genotypes using AMMI and Tai analysis. Journal of crop breeding, 5 (2), 78 – 90. [In Persian].
Shoaie Deylami, M., & Asimi, M. H. (2009). Investigation of yield stability and adaptability of tobacco flue- cured CMS varieties in Guillan province. Annual Report of Rasht Research Center. Pp 63-80. [In Persian].
Yan, W., Kang, M. S., Ma, B., Wood, S. & Cornelious. P. L. (2007). GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype by environment data. Crop Science, 47: 643-655.
Zamani, P. (2010). Agronomy and curing of tobacco. Beh Andishan Publishers, 160 p. [In Persian].
Plant Productions
Volume 45, Issue 3
Autumn 2022
Pages 311-321