Plant Productions

Plant Productions

Study of quantitative and qualitative traits and resistance to bolting and Cercospora disease of new sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars in autumn cultivation

Document Type : Research Paper - Industrial Crops

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Sugar Beet Research, Safiabad Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Dezful, Iran
2 Professor, Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREOO), Karaj, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREOO), Golestan, Gonbad, Iran
Abstract
Introduction
Autumn cultivation has been proposed as a strategy to take advantage of seasonal rainfall and reduce irrigation water consumption. However, this approach has faced major challenges, particularly the incidence of Cercospora leaf spot disease and bolting, across different regions.
 Materials and Methods
Considering the adverse effects of bolting and Cercospora leaf spot disease on both the quantitative and qualitative yield of autumn-sown sugar beet, this study was conducted to evaluate the performance of 16 sugar beet cultivars in terms of bolting resistance, Cercospora resistance, and yield potential. The experiment was carried out during the 2022–2023 growing season using a randomized complete block design with four replications in two regions: Khuzestan province (Dezful) and Golestan province (Gonbad-e Kavus). In the Dezful region, the bolting percentage was zero for all cultivars; therefore, this trait was excluded from the analysis of variance for that location.
 Results and Discussion
In Dezful region, analysis of variance indicated significant differences among cultivars for all measured traits, except bolting and sugar content. Mean comparisons showed that the highest white sugar yield was obtained from the Vanilla (10.60 t ha⁻¹) and Volga (9.49 t ha⁻¹) cultivars. The highest root yield was recorded for Vanilla (83.10 t ha⁻¹) and Sibelius (79.81 t ha⁻¹). The highest white sugar content was observed in Volga (13.77%), Flixter (13.36%), and Algar (13.26%). Regarding root impurities, Volga (1.83 meq 100 g⁻¹ pulp) and Balzan (1.89 meq 100 g⁻¹ pulp) had the lowest sodium content, while Volga (2.55 meq 100 g⁻¹ pulp) and Allegra (2.56 meq 100 g⁻¹ pulp) had the lowest potassium levels.The lowest amino nitrogen content was found in Allegra (2.94 meq 100 g⁻¹ pulp), Algar (3.43), Pegaz (3.35), and Contenta (3.09). Sugar extraction efficiency was highest in Volga (86.46%), followed by Balzan (83.36%) and Lodata (83.33%). Among the evaluated cultivars, only Casablanca exhibited a semi-resistant reaction to Cercospora leaf spot (score 3.88 out of 9), while the remaining cultivars ranged from semi-sensitive to sensitive (scores >4). No bolting was observed in any cultivar in Dezful, whereas the sensitive control exhibited 36.84% bolting. This suggests that although conditions were partially favorable for bolting, the tested cultivars expressed resistance, likely influenced by climatic conditions during the growing season.
In the Gonbad-e Kavus region, analysis of variance showed that cultivar effects were significant for all traits except root yield and sodium content. Mean comparisons showed that the highest white sugar yield was obtained from Volga (10.26 t ha⁻¹) and Algar (9.21 t ha⁻¹). The highest sugar content was recorded in Volga (17.33%), Contenta (17.28%), Sy_muse (17.24%), Vanilla (17.13%), and Flickster (17.11%). The highest white sugar content was observed in Volga (14.87%), Sy_muse (14.27%), Vanilla (13.96%), and Contenta (13.94%). Regarding root impurities, Volga (4.73 meq 100 g⁻¹ pulp) had the lowest potassium content, while other cultivars showed higher potassium levels (>5 meq 100 g⁻¹ pulp). Except for Oxalide (2.03 meq 100 g⁻¹ pulp), Laudata (1.72), and Balzan (1.77), which showed relatively high amino nitrogen levels, the remaining cultivars had low amino nitrogen content (<1.5 meq 100 g⁻¹ pulp). The highest sugar extraction efficiency was observed in Volga (85.56%). Most cultivars showed resistance to semi-resistance against Cercospora leaf spot, with Balzan and Vanilla showing complete resistance. The lowest bolting percentages were observed in Balzan (3.32%), Oxalide (3.62%), Sibelius (3.96%), and Cardamone (4.14%), whereas the sensitive control showed a bolting rate of 93.41%.
Conclusion
Overall, the environmental conditions of Dezful were more favorable for the development and establishment of Cercospora leaf spot disease than those of Gonbad-e Kavus. In contrast, environmental conditions in the Gonbad-e Kavus region were more conducive to bolting than in Dezful. These findings indicate that successful autumn cultivation of sugar beet depends not only on selecting cultivars resistant to bolting and Cercospora leaf spot but also on careful consideration of regional environmental conditions.
Keywords
Subjects

Arjmand, M.N. (1998). Identification of the pathotypes of the fungus that causes sugar beet leaf spot disease  (Cercospora beticola Sacc) and the reaction of Beta species to it. Sugar beet seed institute, pp 38. final report of project. [In Persian].
Bayat, A., Dastmalchi, A., Shahbazi, H.A. & Fazli, H.  (2000). Investigation the possibility of winter cultivation of sugar beet without irrigation to get water from cereals. Final report of project. Issue. Khorsan Razavi. [In Persian].
Cook, D., & Scott, R.  (1993). The sugar beet crop, science into practice. Champan and Hall Press.
Fasahat, P., Hosseinpour, M., Kakueinezhad, M., Hemayatim S.S., & Laidig, F.  (2023). Effect of latitude on sugar beet bolting occurrence. Poljoprivreda i Sumarstvo, 69 (2), 181-190.‏
Hamidi, H., Ahmadi, M., & Taleghani, D.  (2022). Selection of suitable sugar beet genotypes for winter sowing  (Pending) in Torbat-e-Jam region. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 20 (3), 335-348. https://doi.org/10.22067/jcesc.2022.74787.1138
Hasanvandi, M.S., Hoseinpour, M., Yarahmadi, S., Jalilian, A., Bazrafshan, M., Nooshkam, A., & Babai, B. (2023). Analytical report of the autumn sugar beet cultivation in Iran in the crop year 2021-2022. Sugar beet seed institute, pp 36, Final report of project. [In Persian].
Hoffmann, C.M., & Kluge-Severin, S.  (2011). Growth analysis of autumn and spring sown sugar beet. European Journal of Agronomy, 34 (1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.09.001
Hoffmann, C.M., Koch, H.J., & Märländer, B.  (2021). Sugar beet. In Crop Physiology Case Histories for Major Crops,  (pp. 634-672). Academic Press.
Hoseinpour, M., Taleghani, D., & Aghaizadeh, M. (2020). Naming and release of a monogerm hybrid tolerant to Bolting and resistant to cercospora leaf spot disease of sugar beet suitable for the southwest of the country. Sugar beet seed institute, pp 29. Final report of project. [In Persian].
Jahani moghadam, E., Parsa, S., Mahmoudi, S., & Ahmadi, M.  (2017). Effect of planting date and cultivar on yield and the early flowering in autumn sowing of sugar beet varieties. Agronomy and Plant Breeding Journal, 13 (2), 43-57. [In Persian].
Kunz, M., Martin, D., & Puke, H.  (2002). Precision of beet analyses in Germany explained for polarization. Zuckerindustrie, 127 (1), 13-21.
Metzger, M.J., Bunce, R.G.H., Jongman, R.H., Mücher, C.A., & Watkins, J.W.  (2005). A climatic stratification of the environment of Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 14 (6), 549-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2005.00190.x
Milford, G., Jarvis, P., & Walters, C.A.  (2010). vernalization-intensity model to predict bolting in sugar beet. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 148 (2), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859609990323
Monteiro, F., Frese, L., Castro, S., Duarte, M.C., Paulo, O.S., Loureiro, J., & Romeiras, M.M.  (2018). Genetic and genomic tools to asssist sugar beet improvement, the value of the crop wild relatives. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 74-85. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00074
Niazian, M., Rajabi, A., Amiri, R., Orazizadeh, M.R., & Sharifi, H.  (2012). Relationship among effective traits on root yield and sugar content in different sugar beet O-type genotypes for autumn sowing. Plant Productions, 35 (2), 115-135. [In Persian].
Nusrat, N., Goldani, M., Rezai, J.  (2021). Effect of N fertilizer and growth stimulation bacteria on growth of sugar beet in delayed sowing. Plant Productions, 44 (2), 295-304. https://doi.org/10.22055/ppd.2020.30457.1811 [In Persian].
Ourazizadeh, M.R.  (2001). Genetic analysis of resistance to bolting and leaf spot disease in sugar beet leaf, Master's thesis. Islamic Azad University, Karaj branch, Iran [In Persian].
Rajabi, A., Ahmadi, M., Azizpour, M.H., Moharamzadeh, M., Jamali, H., Abdillahi,  K., & Anahid, S.  (2018). Evaluation of the agronomic value of foreign sugar beet cultivars in autumn sowing areas. Sugar beet seed institute, pp 24, Final report of project. [In Persian].
Rajabi, A., Ahmadi, M., Azizpour, M.H., Nemati, R., Ourazizadeh, M.R., & Jamali, H.  (2019). Study of agronomic characteristics and bolting resistance of foreign sugar beet varieties in autumn-sown regions. Sugar beet seed institute, pp 31. Final report of project. [In Persian].
Rajabi, A., Rezai, J., Darabi, S., Saberi, A.R., Hasanvandi, M.S., Khedri, G.H., Fathirad, M.H., Shahmoradi, S.H., Ahmadi, M., Abdollahi, K., Bakhtiari, K., & Jazaeri Nooshabadi, M.R.  (2021). Study of yield, quality and bolting resistance of foreign sugar beet varieties in autumn-sown regions. Sugar beet seed institute, pp 23, Final report of project. [In Persian]
Reinfeld, E., Emmerich, G., Baumgarten, C., Winner & Beiss, U.  (1974). Zur Voraussage des Melassez zuckersaus Ruben analysen Zucker. Chapman & Hall, World Crop Series.
Reinsdorf, E., Koch, H.J., Loel, J., & Hoffmann, C.  (2014). Yield of bolting winter beet  (Beta vulgaris L.) as affected by plant density, genotype and environment. European Journal of Agronomy, 54, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.11.011
Ribeiro, I.C., Pinheiro, C., Ribeiro, C.M., Veloso, M.M., Simoes-Costa, M.C., Evaristo, I., Paulo, O.S., & Ricardo, C.P.  (2016). Genetic diversity and physiological performance of Portuguese wild beet (Beta vulgaris spp. maritima) from three contrasting habitats. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7 (1), 1293. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01293
Rinaldi, M., & Vonella, A.V.  (2006). The response of autumn and spring sown sugar beet  (Beta vulgaris L.) to irrigation in Southern Italy: water and radiation use efficiency. Field Crops Research, 95 (2-3), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.12.004
Rossi, V., Meriggi, P., Biancardi, E., & Rosso, F.  (2000). Effect of Cercospora leaf spot on sugar beet growth, yield and quality, Cercospora beticola Sacc. biology, agronomic influence and control measures in sugar beet, pp. 49-76.
Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S., Shirzadi, M., Aghaeezadeh, M., Taleghani, D., Javaheri, M., & Aliasghari, A.  (2012). Evaluation of sowing and harvesting date effects on yield and quality of five sugar beet cultivars in jiroft region (autumn planting). Journal of Sugar Beet, 28 (1), 42-25. https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2012.659 [In Persian].
Schnepel, K., & Hoffmann, C.  (2016). Effect of extending the growing period on yield formation of sugar beet. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 202 (6), 530-541.https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12153
Skaracis, G.N., & Biancardi, E.  (2000). Breeding for Cercospora resistance in sugar beet. In: Cercospora beticola Sacc. Biology, Agronomic Influence and Control Measures in Sugar Beet, Vol. 2, eds. pp. 177-196.
Streibie, J.C, Ritz, C., Pipper, C.B., Yndgaard, F., Fredlund, K., & Thomsen, J.N.  (2009).Sugar beet, bioethanol, and climate change. In IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 6 (24), IOP Publishing.
Taleghani, D., Saremirad, A., Hosseinpour, M., Ahmadi, M., Hamidi, H., & Nemati, R.  (2022). Genotype × Environment interaction effect on white sugar yield of winter-sown short-season sugar seet  (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars. Seed and Plant Journal, 38 (1), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.22092/spj.2022.360021.1275 [In Persian].
Taleghani, D., Moharamzadeh, M., Hemayati, S.S., Mohammadian, R., & Farahmand, R.  (2011). Effect of sowing and harvest time on yield of autumn-sown sugar beet in Moghan region in Iran. Seed and Plant Production Journal, 27 (2), 355-371. https://doi.org/10.22092/sppj.2017.110442 [In Persian].
Taleghani, D., Rajabi, A., Saremirad, A., & Khodadadi, SH.  (2023). Genotype-enviroment interaction analysis and selection of sugar beet stable genotype in terms of white sugar yield using AMMI model. Plant Pruductions,46 (2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.22055/ppd.2023.43177.2089 [In Persian].
Taleghani, D., Mohammadian, R., & Sadeghzadeh hemayati, S.  (2014). Guide to planting, planting and harvesting autumn sugar beet. Agricultural Education Publications, First Edition, pp,194. [In Persian].