Plant Productions

Plant Productions

Evaluation of morphological variability of bird’s-foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) accessions in Khuzestan province

Document Type : Research Paper - Plant Breeding

Authors
1 M.Sc. Graduate, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract
Introduction
Bird’s-foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.; Persian: Yonjeh pa’kalaghi) is a salt-tolerant, nitrogen-fixing forage legume from the Fabaceae family, valued for its adaptability to diverse environments and its role in sustainable agriculture. The species exhibits considerable polymorphism and morphological variation across its natural range, with the Mediterranean region recognized as a center of genetic diversity. Despite its ecological and agronomic significance, morphological diversity in natural habitats of Iran remains understudied, especially in the southwest, where no comprehensive evaluation has been conducted. This study addresses this gap by assessing morphological traits in accessions collected from multiple areas of the region to better understand variation under natural conditions.
 Material and Methods
This study investigated the morphological diversity of bird’s-foot trefoil by collecting 126 genotypes from nine distinct accessions across Khuzestan province. The accessions included Ahvaz, Sheyban, Mollasani, Hamidiyeh, Susangerd, Karun, Minoo Island, Hendijan, and Shavoor. Sample collection was conducted from March 2023 to January 2024 in natural habitats to capture the full range of phenotypic variation. A total of 18 morphological traits were evaluated-14 qualitative and 4 quantitative-selected based on the guidelines of the International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR) and previous research findings. The qualitative traits included growth habit, vegetative form, relative size of the three leaflets, leaflet shape, leaflet indumentum, leaflets thickness, leaflet apex, stem firmness, stem cross-sectional shape, stem color, stem indumentum, corolla color, calyx teeth shape, and calyx indumentum. The quantitative traits measured were central leaflet length, central leaflet width, the ratio of calyx teeth to calyx tube length, and plant height. Data were analyzed using multivariate statistical methods. Cluster analysis was performed using Ward’s method and the Euclidean distance coefficient to group accessions. The accuracy of clustering was validated through discriminant function analysis using SPSS software. In addition, principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted in R software to identify the key traits contributing to morphological variability and to visualize the relationships among genotypes.
Results and Discussion
Analysis of vegetative form among the studied genotypes revealed that 88.10% of the genotypes were herbaceous, while 11.90% exhibited woody structure. Regarding growth habit, 65.87% of genotypes were decumbent, 22.22% were erect or ascending, and 11.90% were like procumbent or prostrate. The Minoo Island accession was distinct in both vegetative form (woody) and growth habit (similar to procumbent or prostrate plants), setting it apart from the other accessions. Considerable variation was observed in several qualitative traits, including leaflet size (three leaflets per leaf, same or different sizes), leaflet apex, leaflet shape, and corolla color within the accessions, demonstrating high variation even on a single plant. Conversely, certain traits, such as stem color and cross-sectional shape, exhibited no variation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that the three of the four quantitative traits were statistically significant at the 5% level. Duncan's multiple range test effectively distinguished homogeneous groups and identified similarities and differences among accessions. Cluster analysis grouped the accessions based on morphological traits, with Minoo Island forming a distinct cluster due to its unique vegetative form and growth habit. These results were further supported by principal component analysis (PCA), which helped visualize trait contributions and genotype relationships. Discriminant function analysis confirmed the accuracy of the cluster groupings. Interestingly, some accessions from geographically distant locations clustered together, suggesting that similar ecological conditions may influence morphological traits. To isolate genetic variation from environmental effects, future evaluations should be conducted under uniform cultivation conditions.
 Conclusion
The observed morphological diversity among bird’s-foot trefoil accessions highlights the species’ adaptability to varying environmental conditions. This variability is particularly valuable for conservation and breeding programs. The unique characteristics of the Minoo Island accession, especially its vegetative form and growth habit, make it a promising candidate for targeted germplasm conservation and further agronomic evaluation.
Keywords
Subjects

References
Abbott, R. J. (1981). The keel petal colour polymorphism of Lotus corniculatus L. in Scotland. New Phytologist, 88(3), 549-553.
Akhani, H. (2015). Plants and vegetation of north-west persian gulf: the coasts and islands of Khore Musa, Mahshahr and adjacent areas. University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]
Akhavan Roofigar, A., Avaz Zadeh, A. M., & Hamzeh'ee, B. (2024). Morphological diversity and numerical taxonomy of Nerium L. populations in Iran. Taxonomy and Biosystematics, 16(1), 47-60. [In Persian]
Bagheri, M. H., Alizadeh, M., Jafari, M., Seifi, E., & Zaynali Nezhad, K. (2024). Morphological evaluation of some Caprifig accessions in South Khorasan Razavi. Plant Productions, 1-16. [In Persian]
Beuselinck, P., & Grant, W. (1995). Birdsfoot trefoil. Forages, 1, 237-248.
Bonnemaison, F., & Jones, D. A. (1986). Variation in alien Lotus corniculatus L. 1. Morphological differences between alien and native British plants. Heredity, 56(1), 129-138.
Casler, M. D., & Undersander, D. J. (2019). Identification of temperate pasture grasses and legumes. Horse Pasture Management, 11-35.
Chrtková-Žertová, A. (1967). The variability of critical species of Lotus L. in Iran and in the neighbouring countries I. The circle of L. corniculatus L. and L. gebelia Vent. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica, 2, 283-310.
Chrtková-Žertová, A. (1973). A monographic study of Lotus corniculatus L. 1. Central and Northern Europe. Rozpravy Ceskoslovenske Akademie, 83, 1-94.
Dinarvand, M. (2021). Flora of Khuzestan province. Reaserch Institute of Forests and Rangelands. [In Persian]
Drobná, J. (2010). Morphological variation in natural populations of Lotus corniculatus in association to geographical parameters of collecting sites. Biologia, 65(2), 213-218.
Gaafar, A., Abd El-Ghani, M., El Hadidy, A., & Hussein, E. (2021). A multivariate morphometric analysis of the genus Lotus L., 1753 (Fabaceae, Loteae) from egypt. Bulletin of the Iraq Natural History Museum, 16(4), 509-533.
Giagourta, P., Abraham, E. M., Parissi, Z. M., & Kyriazopoulos, A. P. (2015). Phenotypic variation of Lotus corniculatus L. natural populations in relation to habitat type and management regimes. Archives of Biological Sciences, 67(3), 841-848.
Grant, W. F. (1991). Chromosomal evolution and aneuploidy in Lotus. Elsevier.
IBPGR. (1984). Forage Legume Descriptors.
Jalilian, N., Nemati Paykani, M., & Assadi, M. (2016). A taxonomic revision of the genus Lotus L.(Fabaceae) in Iran. The Iranian Journal of Botany, 22(1), 16-20.
Karimi, H. (2001). Weeds of Iran (Vol. 1). Academic Publishing Center. [In Persian]
Mohammadi, A. (2006). Analysis of molecular data from the point of view of genetic diversity. The 9th Congress of Agricultural Sciences and Plant Breeding of Iran, 96-119. [In Persian]
Mozaffarian, V. (1999). Flora of Khuzistan. Member of the Scientific Staff of Forests & Rangelands Reaserch Institute. [In Persian]
Mozaffarian, V. (2004). Plant classification (book 1: morphology and taxonomy). Amir Kabir Publications Tehran. [In Persian]
Naghavi, M. R., Ghareyazie, B., & Hosseini Salekdeh, G. (2007). Molecular markers. University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]
Safipour, S., Khaleghi, E., & Moallemi, N. (2021). Evaluation of genetic diversity of different Olive genotypes in some cities of Khuzestan province using morphological marker. Plant Productions, 44(1), 1-12. [In Persian]
Salgotra, R. K., & Chauhan, B. S. (2023). Genetic diversity, conservation, and utilization of plant genetic resources. Genes, 14(1), 174.
Savo Sardaro, M. L., Atallah, M., Tavakol, E., Russi, L., & Porceddu, E. (2008). Diversity for AFLP and SSR in natural populations of Lotus corniculatus L. from Italy. Crop Science, 48(3), 1080-1089.
Small, E., Grant, W. F., & Crompton, C. (1984). A taxonomic study of the Lotus corniculatus complex in Turkey. Canadian Journal of Botany, 62(5), 1044-1053.
Steiner, J. J., & García de los Santos, G. G. (2001). Adaptive ecology of Lotus corniculatus L. genotypes: I. Plant morphology and RAPD marker characterizations. Crop Science, 41(2), 552-563.
USDA, N. (2024). The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Team, Greensboro.
Vuckovic, S., Stojanovic, I., Prodanovic, S., Cupina, B., Zivanovic, T., Vojin, S., & Jelacic, S. (2007). Morphological and nutritional properties of birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) autochthonous populations in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 54, 421-428.
Xie, W. H., Zhao, W. W., Wang, L. T., Zhao, L. L., & Wang, P. C. (2023). Genetic diversity analysis of 22 Lotus corniculatus germplasm resources based on phenotypic quantitative traits. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 31(1), 173.