Document Type : Research Paper - Agronomy

Authors

1 PhD Student of Agronomy, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Ahvaz, Iran

4 Researcher, Safiabad Agricultural Research and Education and Natural Resources Center, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Commercial corn varieties for cultivation in different regions of the world for kernel and fodder production are hybrid type varieties that are offered annually by seed production companies for planting in farmers' fields. In recent years, the area under corn cultivation in Iran has increased, indicating the importance of this crop in the country's agricultural policies. Fodder corn varieties are classified into early- maturing (less than 85 days), medium maturing (85-135 days), and late-maturing (more than 135 days) types. Optimal planting density is a key factor in maximizing yield, as it must be adjusted based on regional climatic conditions and the cultivated varieties.  Corn responds to plant density more significantly than other cereal crops due to its impact on yield components. Selecting high-yielding cultivars and applying appropriate planting densities also improve water-use efficiency. Additionally, determining the optimal planting density for maternal lines in seed production can enhance seed yield per unit area, ultimately increasing.
 Materials and Methods
This study aimed to evaluate the eco-physiological responses of different corn lines to planting density in the northern of Khuzestan. The experiment was conducted during the summers of 2018 and 2019 at the Safi-Abad-Dezful Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Training Center. A factorial experiment was implemented using a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The main factor was planting density at three levels (60, 85 and 110 thousand plants per hectare), while the second factor was genotype, consisting of five experimental corn lines (SD-95-11, C3-95-5, C3-95-15, C4-95-2, C4-95-3) and the control line MO17).
Results and Discussion
The highest seed yield (2115 kg ha-1) was observed at a planting density of 110000 plants per hectare for line 103, whereas the lowest yield (1030 kg ha-1) was recorded at a density of 60000 plants per hectare for line 119. The results showed that the density of 110000 plants per hectare was optimal for most measured traits, making it the most suitable planting density for the tested lines. Additionally, line 103 was identified as the high potential genotype, suggesting its potential use in corn breeding programs for hot and dry regions.  
 Conclusion
Previous studies indicate that optimal planting density for grain corn is approximately 80000 plants per hectare, while for fodder corn, it is around 100000 plants per hectare. However, since the experimental materials in this study were pure corn lines, which are generally smaller than hybrids, they required higher planting densities than commercial corn varieties. Determining the appropriate planting density for corn lines is particularly important for individuals and companies engaged in seed production, as pure maternal and paternal lines are used in this sector. Achieving the optimum plant density in corn lines farms can be very important for seed producer companies, because pure paternal and maternal lines are used in these farms. On the other hand, out of a total of 6 lines used, line number 103 was selected as the best line that can be used in corn breeding programs in hot and dry regions of the country.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
Allison, J. C. S., & Daynard, T. B. (1979). Effect of change in time of flowering, induced by altering photoperiod or temperature, on attributes related to yield in maize. Crop Science, 19 (1): 1-4.
Al-Naggar, A. M. M., Shabana, R. E. D. A., & Ibrahim, A. A. (2021). Heritability and genetic advance for agronomic, physiologic and yield traits of maize under high plant densities. Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, 22(53): 107-119.‏
Al-Naggar, A. M. M., Shabana, R. E. D. A., & Ibrahim, A. A. (2021). Effect of plant density, genotype and their interaction on agronomical, physiological and yield traits of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology,  22 (49-50), 106-121.‏
Amraei, B. (2022). Effects of planting date and plant density on yield and some physiological characteristics of single cross 550 hybrid maize as a second crop. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 20(4): 683-691.‏
Balazadeh, M., Zamanian, M., Golzardi, F., & Torkashvand, A. M. (2021). Effects of limited irrigation on forage yield, nutritive value and water use efficiency of Persian clover (Trifolium resupinatum) compared to berseem clover (Trifolium alexandrinum). Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 52(16): 1927-1942.‏
Bavar, M. (2008). Effects of planting date density on growth indecies and yield component of hull-less barley. The Thesis of M. Sc. degree. University of Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources of Gorgan, 62p.
Cox, W. J., & Cherney, D. J. (2001). Row spacing, plant density, and nitrogen effects on corn silage. Agronomy Journal93(3): 597-602.
Dhaliwal, D. S., & Williams, M. M. (2020). Understanding variability in optimum plant density and recommendation domains for crowding stress tolerant processing sweet corn. Plos One, 15(2): 185-196.‏
Donaldson, E., Schillinger, W. F., & Dofing, S. M. (2001). Straw production and grain yield relationships in winter wheat. Crop Science41(1), 100-106.
Ghahramani Pirsalami, F., Rahnama, A., Siahpoosh, M., & Boromand Nasab, S. (2016) Effect of sprinkler irrigation with saline water on some morph-physiological traits and grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 18 (2): 147-160.
Imam, Y. (2011). Cereal farming Shiraz: Shiraz University Press [In Persian].
Greveniotis, V., Zotis, S., Sioki, E., & Ipsilandis, C. (2019). Field population density effects on field yield and morphological characteristics of maize. Agriculture, 9(7): 160-173.‏
Hashemi‐Dezfouli, A., & Herbert, S. J. (1992). Intensifying plant density response of corn with artificial shade. Agronomy Journal84(4): 547-551.‏
Jans, W. W., Jacobs, C. M., Kruijt, B., Elbers, J. A., Barendse, S., & Moors, E. J. (2010). Carbon exchange of a maize (Zea mays L.) crop: Influence of phenology. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment139(3): 316-324.
Lashkari, M., Madani, H., Ardakani, M. R., Golzardi, F., & Zargari, K. (2011). Effect of plant density on yield and yield components of different corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 10(3): 450-457.‏
Mahrokh, A., Golzardi, F., Azizi, F., Mofidian, S. M. A., Zamanian, M., Rahjoo, V., Torabi, M., & Soltani, M. (2020). Agronomical Factor Analysis on Grain Maize Yield Decline in Iran with Meta-Analysis Method. Journal of Crops Improvement, 23(1): 73-86 [In Persian]
Mahrokh, A., Shiri, M. R., & Golzardi, F. (2023). Effect of high density planting on grain yield and yield components of promising hybrids and parental lines of maize (Zea mays L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 25(1), 137-153 [In Persian]
Mousavi, R. (2011). The effect of planting date and seed priming in the field on germination characteristics and corn yield in Hamedan, MA, Faculty of Agriculture. Boali Sina University, Hamedan. [In Persian]
Qingfeng, M. E. N. G., Shanchao, Y. U. E., Peng, H. O. U., Zhenling, C. U. I., & Xinping, C. H. E. N. (2016). Improving yield and nitrogen use efficiency simultaneously for maize and wheat in China: a review. Pedosphere26(2): 137-147.‏
Omidi Nasab, D., Meskarbashee, M., & Rahnama, A. (2021). Effect of foliar application of flourish microcombi complex fertilizer and plant density on yield and some quantitative traits of promising sunflower cultivars. Journal of Crop Production, 14(1): 145-160. [In Persian]
Rahmani, A., Alhossini, M. N., & Kalat, S. M. N. (2015). Standard ear yield and some agronomic characteristics of baby corn var. ksc 403 su under influence of planting date and plant density. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 6(2): 104-111
Rezazadeh, H. (2013). Grass plants from planting to harvesting. Mashhad Academic Jihad Publications. [In Persian]
Sandhu, S., & Dhillon, B. S. (2021). Breeding plant type for adaptation to high plant density in tropical maize. A step towards productivity enhancement. Plant Breeding, 140(4): 509-518.‏
Shakarami, G., & Rafiee, M. (2009). Response of corn (Zea mays L.) to planting pattern and density in Iran. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 5(1): 69-73.‏
Sharifi, R. S., Sedghi, M., & Gholipouri, A. (2009). Effect of population density on yield and yield attributes of maize hybrids. Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 4(4): 375-379.‏
Siadat, A. (2012). Cereal farming Volume 1. Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University Press. [In Persian]
Tang, L., Ma, W., Noor, M. A., Li, L., Hou, H., Zhang, X., & Zhao, M. (2018). Density resistance evaluation of maize varieties through new “Density–Yield Model” and quantification of varietal response to gradual planting density pressure. Scientific Reports, 8(1): 172-181.‏
Wang, T., Ma, X., Li, Y., Bai, D., Liu, C., Liu, Z., & Smith, S. (2011). Changes in yield and yield components of single‐cross maize hybrids released in China between 1964 and 2001. Crop Science, 51(2): 512-525.‏
Widdicombe, W. D., & Thelen, K. D. (2002). Row width and plant density effects on corn grain production in the northern Corn Belt. Agronomy Journal, 94(5): 1020-1023.‏
Zhai, L., Xie, R., Ma, D., Liu, G., Wang, P., & Li, S. (2015). Evaluation of individual competitiveness and the relationship between competitiveness and yield in maize. Crop Science, 55(5): 2307-2318.