نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی - باغبانی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه فیزیولوژی و فناوری پس از برداشت، پژوهشکده مرکبات و میوه‌های نیمه‌گرمسیری، موسسه تحقیقات علوم باغبانی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، رامسر، ایران

2 کارشناس ارشد فیزیولوژی گیاهی، گروه فیزیولوژی و فناوری پس از برداشت، پژوهشکده مرکبات و میوه‌های نیمه‌گرمسیری، موسسه تحقیقات علوم باغبانی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، رامسر، ایران

3 استادیار، بخش تحقیقات گیاهان زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی مازندران، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران

چکیده

کیفیت میوه مرکبات معمولا تحت تاثیر نوع رقم، پایه و شرایط پس از برداشت قرار می‌گیرد. در این پژوهش کیفیت میوه سه رقم پرتقال تامسون‌ناول، فوکوموتو و ناولیت روی دو پایه سوئینگل سیتروملو و سیترنج C-35 در زمان برداشت و طی نگهداری (در دو مکان قائم‌شهر و رامسر) بررسی شد. میوه با نسبت ماده جامد محلول به اسید قابل‌تیتراسیون (TSS/TA) برابر 5/6 تا 7 برداشت و ضمن ارزیابی میوه در زمان برداشت، قابلیت نگهداری میوه نیز در سردخانه با دمای 5 درجه سیلسیوس و رطوبت نسبی 85 درصد در روزهای 30 و 60 انبارداری طی دو سال (97 و 98) ارزیابی شد. نتایج نشان داد میوه پرتقال ناولیت روی پایه سیتروملو و پرتقال فوکوموتو روی پایه C-35 دارای ویژگی‌های فیزیکی ‌کوچک‌تری نسبت به تامسون‌ناول و سایر ترکیب پایه و پیوندک بود. رقم ناولیت مشابه تامسون‌ناول روی پایه C-35 میوه درشت‌تر و سنگین‌تری تولید نمود. خطای دو حجم در هر دو رقم فوکوموتو و ناولیت روی هر دو پایه نسبت به شاهد ‌کم‌تر بود. در زمان برداشت، میوه رقم فوکوموتو روی هر دو پایه ضخامت پوست بیش‌تری (بیش از 4 میلی‌متر) نسبت به دو رقم دیگر داشت. در شروع انبارداری میزان آب‌میوه هر دو رقم اختلاف معناداری با شاهد نداشت لیکن در پایان نگهداری میوه ناولیت روی پایه C-35 ‌کم‌ترین میزان آب‌میوه (73/35 درصد) را داشت. میوه‌های فوکوموتو و ناولیت روی هر دو پایه، شاخص فناوری بالاتری نسبت به تامسون‌ناول در زمان برداشت داشتند. میزان TSS در زمان برداشت در میوه پرتقال‌های تامسون‌ناول و ناولیت روی پایه سیتروملو ‌کم‌ترین (به ترتیب 22/9 و 78/9 درصد) بود. میوه ناولیت و تامسون‌ناول روی پایه C-35 میزان TA بالاتری داشتند. در همه تیمارها میزان TA طی نگهداری روند کاهشی داشت. پایه C-35 بیش‌ترین سهم را در بالابودن نسبت TSS/TA در میوه فوکوموتو داشت که همین نسبت طی نگهداری نیز حفظ شده است. میوه ناولیت در زمان برداشت روی هر دو پایه میزان TSS/TA ‌کم‌تری (5/7 و 12/7) داشت. در شروع انبارداری، متوسط آسکوربیک‌اسید در هر سه رقم روی پایه C-35 بالاتر از همان ارقام روی پایه سیتروملو بود. لیکن طی نگهداری و در پایان انبارداری سطح آسکوربیک‌اسید میوه فوکوموتو روی هر دو پایه حفظ شد. مقدار *a، زاویه رنگ و شاخص رنگ‌گیری (CCI) پوست میوه پرتقال ناولیت در زمان برداشت به دلیل منفی بودن روی پایه سیتروملو (12/1-) و C-35 (61/0-) متفاوت از دو رقم دیگر بود. در زمان برداشت ظرفیت آنتی‌اکسیدانی میوه فوکوموتو روی سیتروملو 99/43 درصد و روی پایه C-35 به میزان 12/62 درصد بود. مقدار ظرفیت آنتی‌اکسیدانی و فنل‌کل طی نگهداری روند افزایشی داشت. ارزیابی ارگانولپتیک نشان داد که میوه فوکوموتو همانند تامسون‌ناول از نظر وضعیت ظاهری پوست و گوشت، ترشی، عطر و طعم روی پایه C-35 امتیاز بهتری نسبت به میوه همین ارقام روی پایه سیتروملو کسب نمود. میوه ناولیت تولید شده روی پایه سیتروملو از نظر طعم و شیرینی امتیاز بالاتری (7) نسبت به حالت استفاده از پایه C-35 (6) داشت. برای داشتن میوه زودرس ترکیب فوکوموتو/ C-35 مناسب است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of the fruit quality of Fukumoto, Navelate and Thomson Novel orange cultivars on Citrumelo and C-35 rootstocks

نویسندگان [English]

  • Javad Fattahi Moghadam 1
  • Seyedeh Elham Seyedghasemi 2
  • Negin Akhlaghi Amiri 3

1 Associate Professor, Postharvest Physiology and Technology Department, Citrus and Subtropical Fruits Research Center, Horticultural Science Research Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Ramsar, Iran

2 Former M. Sc of plant physiology

3 Assistant Professor of Horticulture Crops Research Department, Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Sari, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction
It is important to attend the physical and biochemical characteristics of the fruit, especially in newly introduced cultivars that may be unknown to the consumer. Nutritive compounds in fruit are usually influenced by variety, rootstock and post-harvest conditions. In this article, the results related to the evaluation of the fruit quality of three varieties of oranges on two rootstocks have been examined at harvest time and during storage.
Materials and methods
Fruit of Thomson Novel, Fukumoto, and Navelate oranges on two rootstocks including Swingle Citrumelo and Citrange C-35 were harvested when TSS/TA reached about 6.5-7. Fruits were evaluated at the harvest time and then stored in cool storage (5oC, RH=85%) for 60 days. The fruit quality were checked on the 30th and 60th days of storage for two years. Evaluated Characteristics included fruit lenght, width, thickness; arithmetic, geometric, equivalent diameter and harmonic means ; fruit aspect ratio, sphericity, surface area, true volume, apparent volume, volume error, density, weight, weight loss, peel thickness, juice percentage, peel color indices (L*, a*, b*, hue angle, chroma and CCI), total soluble solid (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), technological index (TI), total phenol, ascorbic acid, antioxidant capacity and organoleptic evaluation.
Results
The fruit of Navelate orange on Citrumelo rootstock and Fukumoto orange on C-35 rootstock had smaller physical characteristics than Thomson Novel. In all treatments, the shape of the fruit was balanced and without elongation or indentation. The fruit of Navelate on Citrumelo (aspect ratio: 96.96) was slightly elongated. Navelate variety on C-35 produced larger and heavier fruit similarly Thomson fruit. The volume error in Fukumoto and Navelate varieties and on both rootstocks was less than the control. At the time of harvest, the fruit of the Fukumoto had a thicker peel (more than 4 mm) on both rootstocks than the other cultivars. The amount of juice percentage was not significantly different than control at harvest time, but at the end of storage, the fruit of Navelate on the C-35 had the lowest (35.73%) of juice percentage. Fukumoto and Navelate fruits on both rootstocks had higher TI index than Thomson at harvest time. The TSS at harvest time was the lowest (9.22 and 9.78 respectively) only in the fruits of Thomson and Navelate on Citrumelo rootstock. Navelate and Thomson fruits had higher TA on C-35 rootstock. In all treatments, the amount of TA decreased during storage. Fukumoto fruit on C-35 had the highest TSS/TA ratio, which was preserved during storage. The fruit of Navelate had a lower TSS/TA level at the harvest time on both rootstocks (7.12 and 7.5). At the time of harvest, the average ascorbic acid in all three cultivars on C-35 rootstock was higher than the same cultivars on Citrumelo rootstock. The value of a*, hue angle, and CCI of the skin of Navelate orange with a negative value were different from the other cultivars on Citrumelo and C-35 rootstocks (-1.12 and -0.61 respectively). The antioxidant capacity of Fukumoto fruit was 43.99% on Citrumelo and 62.12% on C-35 rootstock at the harvest time. The amount of antioxidant capacity and total phenol increased during storage. The organoleptic evaluation showed that the Fukumoto as Thomson, scored better in relations to peel and pulp appearance, sourness, aroma and taste than the fruit of the same cultivars on the C-35 rootstock. Navelate fruit produced higher score in terms of taste and sweetness (7) on Citrumelo rootstock than C-35 (6) rootstock.
Conclusion
Based on the TSS/TA ratio, it was determined that Fukumoto and Navelate oranges are early and late ripening respectively. Citrumelo rootstock increased late ripening in Navelate fruit and contrary C-35 rootstock increased early ripening in Fukumoto fruit. According to the a* and CCI indices, the Navelate fruits did not have suitable coloring at the time of harvest, and Citrumelo rootstock delayed the color change of the fruit skin. In general, the organoleptic characteristics of the fruit on C-35 were better than Citrumelo. Finally, it seems that the combination of Navelate/C-35 is more suitable than Navelate/Citrumelo. Fukumoto/C-35 combination is suitable for having early ripening fruit.
.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Adaptation
  • Citrus
  • Graft
  • Physicochemical
  • Storability
A.O.A.C., )2002). Association of official agricultural chemist's official methods of analysis. 12 Ed. Washington, D.C. United States of America.
Abd El Motty, Z. E., Shahin, M. F. M., & Hagagg, L. F. (2006). Response of ‘Valencia’orange trees budded on ‘Troyer’citrange and Sour orange to foliar application of some macro and micronutrients. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2(11), 952-965.
Abdullah, M. H. R. O., Ch'ng, P. E., & Yunus, N. A. (2012). Some physical properties of Musk Lime (Citrus microcarpa). International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, 6(12), 1122-1125.
Abouzari, A., & Nezhad, N. M. (2016). The investigation of citrus fruit quality. Popular characteristic and breeding. Acta universitatis agriculturae et silviculturae mendelianae brunensis, 64(3), 725-740.
Al-Hosni, A. S., Mustafa, S., Al-Busaidi, K., Al-Jabri, M., & Al-Azri, H. (2008, August). Effects of different citrus rootstocks on growth, yield, quality and granulation of'Hamlin'orange in Oman. In IX International Symposium on Integrating Canopy, Rootstock and Environmental Physiology in Orchard Systems 903 (pp. 563-568).
Ali, G. M. (2002). Effects of four citrus rootstocks on fruit quality and storability of ‘Fremont’tangerine. Tanta Univiversity, Journal of Agricultural Research, 28(3/1), 312-326.
Al-Jaleel, A., Zekri, M., & Hammam, Y. (2005). Yield, fruit quality, and tree health of ‘Allen Eureka’lemon on seven rootstocks in Saudi Arabia. Scientia horticulturae, 105(4), 457-465.
Bassal, M. A. (2009). Growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Marisol’clementine grown on four rootstocks in Egypt. Scientia Horticulturae, 119(2), 132-137.
Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M. E., & Berset, C. (1995). Use of free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. Lebens Wissen and Technology, 28, 25-30.
Cano, A., & Bermejo, A. (2011). Influence of rootstock and cultivar on bioactive compounds in citrus peels. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 91(9), 1702-1711.
Chaparro-Zambrano, H. N., Velásquez-Ramirez, H. A., & Orduz-Rodriguez, J. O. (2017). Evaluation of 'Arrayaría'tangerine (Citrus reticulata Blanco) grafted onto different rootstocks in tropical lowlands of Colombian Orinoquia, 2005-2011 (second cycle). Agronomía Colombiana, 35(1), 29-34.
de Carvalho, D. U., da Cruz, M. A., Colombo, R. C., Tazima, Z. H., & Neves, C. S. V. J. (2020). Fruit quality of ‘Salustiana’seedless oranges during cold storage: effect of carnauba-based wax and rootstocks. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 14, 3397-3407.
Fatahi Moghadam, J., Hashempour A. & Fifaei R. (2019). Improving Quality and Antioxidant Characteristics of Pulp and Peel of Citrus During Storage by Pre-Harvest Spray of Calcium Chloride on Fruit. Plant Production, 42(1), 1-14. [In Persian]
Fatahi Moghadam, J., Seyedghasemi, S. E., & Najafi, K. 2018. Evaluation of physico-biochemichal characteristics of Fruits in new varieties of Noushin and Shahin mandarins during storage. Journal of Horticultural Science, 31(4), 751-764. [In Persian].
Fatahi Moghadam, J., Seyedghasemi, S. E., & MohamadAlyan, Y. (2017). Effect of rootstock on fruit quality of Yashar mandarin at harvest time and during storage. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology, 18 (2), 177-194. [In Persian]
Fatahi Moghadam, J., Seyedghasemi, S. E., & Najafi, K. (2018). Evaluation of fruit physico-chemical characteristics of new mandarins Noushin (Citrus reticulata cv. Noushin) and Shahin (Citrus reticulata cv. Shahin) during different harvesting times. Plant Production (Scientific Journal of Agriculture), 40(4). [In Persian].
Fatahi Moghadam, J., Seyedghasemi, S. E., Taheri, H., & Najafi, K. (2021). Physicochemical and sensory characteristics and bioactive compounds of khoram mandarin at harvest time and during storage as a newly introduced cultivar. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology, 22 (1), 41-54. [In Persian].
Fattahi, J., Hamidoghli, Y., Fotouhi, R., Ghasemnejad, M., & Bakhshi, D. (2011). Assessment of fruit quality and antioxidant activity of three citrus species during ripening. South-Western Journal of Horticulture Biology and Environment, 2(2), 113-128.
Forner-Giner, M. A., Alcaide, A., Primo-Millo, E., & Forner, J. B. (2003). Performance of ‘Navelina’orange on 14 rootstocks in Northern Valencia (Spain). Scientia Horticulturae, 98(3), 223-232.
García-Sánchez, F., Perez-Perez, J. G., Botía, P., & Martínez, V. (2006). The response of young mandarin trees grown under saline conditions depends on the rootstock. European Journal of Agronomy, 24(2), 129-139.
Hassan, Z. H., Lesmayati, S., Qomariah, R., & Hasbianto, A. (2014). Effects of wax coating applications and storage temperatures on the quality of tangerine citrus (Citrus reticulata) var. Siam Banjar. International food research journal, 21(2).
Hifny, H. A., Elrazik, A. M., Abdrabboh, G. A., & Sultan, M. Z. (2012). Effect of some citrus rootstocks on fruit quality and storability of washington navel orange under cold storage conditions. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 12(10), 1266-1273.
Jimenez-Cuesta, M., Cuquerella, J., & Martinez-Javaga, J. M. (1982). Determination of a color index for citrus fruit degreening. In Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture/[International Citrus Congress, November 9-12, 1981, Tokyo, Japan; K. Matsumoto, editor]. Shimizu, Japan: International Society of Citriculture, 1982-1983..
Kaplankiran, M., Demirkeser, T. H., & Yildiz, E. (2005). The Effects of Some Citrus Rootstocks on Fruit Yield and Quality for Okitsu Satsuma during the Juvenility Period in Dörtyol (Hatay, Turkey) Conditions. Proceeding of 7th Int. Cong. of Citrus Nurserymen, 17-21.
Kluge, R. A., Luiza, M., Jomori, L., Jacomino, A. P., Carolina, M., Vitti, D., & Padula, M. (2003). Intermittent warming in ‘Tahiti’ lime treated with an ethylene Inhibitor. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 29, 195-203.
Legua, P., Bellver, R., Forner, J., & Forner-Giner, M. A. (2011). Plant growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Lane Late’navel orange on four citrus rootstocks. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(1), 271-279.
Legua, P., Forner, J. B., Hernandez, F. C. A., & Forner-Giner, M. A. (2014). Total phenolics, organic acids, sugars and antioxidant activity of mandarin (Citrus clementina Hort. ex Tan.): Variation from rootstock. Scientia Horticulturae, 174, 60-64.
Legua, P., Martinez-Cunenca, M. R., Bellver, R., & Forner-Giner, M. A. (2018). Rootstock’s and scion’s impact on lemon quality in southeast Spain. International Agrophysics, 32(3).
Machado, F. L. C., de Oliveira, V. S., & da Costa, J. M. (2011). Postharvest quality of grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.) produced from initial plantings in Ceará state, Brazil. Revista Ciencia Agronomica, 42(4), 965.
Magwaza, L. S., Mditshwa, A., Tesfay, S. Z., & Opara, U. L. (2017). An overview of preharvest factors affecting vitamin C content of citrus fruit. Scientia Horticulturae, 216, 12-21.
Mashayekhi, K., Sadeghi, H., Akbarpour, V., Atashi, S., Mousavizadeh, S. J., Abshaei, M., & Nazari, Z. (2013). Effect of some citrus rootstocks on the amount of biochemical composition of Parson Brown and Mars Oranges in Jiroft. Journal of Agricultura; Science and Technology, 27, 9-17.
McCollum, T. G., Bowman, K. D., & Castle, W. S. (2002). Effects of rootstock on fruit quality and postharvest behavior of'Marsh'grapefruit. In Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society (Vol. 115, pp. 44-46).
Meyers, K. J., Watkins, C. B., Pritts, M. P., Liu, R. H. (2003). Antioxidant and anti-proliferative activities of strawberries. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51, 6887- 6892.
Morales Alfaro, J., Bermejo, A., Navarro, P., Quiñones, A., & Salvador, A. (2021). Effect of rootstock on Citrus fruit quality: A review. Food Reviews International, 1-19.
Qin, Y., Li, G., Wang, L., Teixeira, J. A., Ye, Z., Feng, Q., & Hu, G. (2015). A comparative study between a late-ripening mutant of citrus and its original line in fruit coloration, sugar and acid metabolism at all fruit maturation stage. Fruits, 70(1), 5-11.
Razavi, S. M. A., & BahramParvar, M. (2007). Some physical and mechanical properties of kiwifruit. International Journal of Food Engineering, 3(6).
Sharma, R. R., & Saxena, S. K. (2004). Rootstocks influence granulation in Kinnow mandarin (Citrusnobilis× C. deliciosa). Scientia Horticulturae, 101(3), 235-242.
Tavarini, S., Gil, M. I., Tomas‐Barberan, F. A., Buendia, B., Remorini, D., Massai, R., ... & Guidi, L. (2011). Effects of water stress and rootstocks on fruit phenolic composition and physical/chemical quality in Suncrest peach. Annals of Applied Biology, 158(2), 226-233.
Tuzcu, Ö., Yildrim, B., & Yesiloglu, T. (2004). Effect of different rootstocks and sectors on fruit yield and its distribution depending to the tree canopy. In Proc Int Soc Citriculture, X Congress, Agadir, Morocco, February (pp. 405-408).
Zekri, M. (2008). Performance of Valencia trees on four rootstocks at high density planting. Proceeding of the International Society of Citriculture, China.