Document Type : Research Paper - Agronomy

Authors

1 PhD Student, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran Universityof Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Professor of Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Wheat is one of the most important crop plants in the world. Waterlogging stress causes serious damage to the wheat crop wheat crop worldwide annually, and it is likely that these damages are increasing with climate change. In many cases, waterlogging stress occurs for various reasons in the initial stages of the growth of this plant. There are many reports about the existence of differences in waterlogging stress tolerance in different cultivars and genotypes of wheat, but so far these differences have not been fully exploited. This research was designed and carried out to investigate the effect of waterlogging stress on the dry matter yield of shoot system, the concentration of photosynthetic pigments, the activity level of antioxidant enzymes, the concentration of malondialdehyde and carotenoid content.
 
Materials and Methods
Floods will increase as a result of climate change and in some areas will have a negative impact on wheat production. Plants are obligate aerobic organisms and they need to absorb oxygen from their surroundings to complete their life cycle, growth, reproduction and competition. With 215 million hectares, wheat has the largest area of cultivated plants in the world, waterlogging stress usually damages winter wheat during Seedling establishment and tillering. a field experiment in the form of a split plot design, based on randomized complete blocks in 3 replications accomplished. Stress was applied at the three-leaf stage and at three levels, control (no waterlogging stress), mild stress (48 hours) and severe stress (120 hours) as the main factors. Cultivars and genotypes were also included as secondary factors. Plants were cultivated in pots and grown in open space (outdoor), the water level was maintained about five centimeters above the soil level during the stress period.
 
Results and Discussion
Mild and severe waterlogging stress resulted in a decrease of 14.06 and 38.37 percent of shoot dry matter, respectively, which was significant in all cultivars and genotypes. Different cultivars and genotypes showed different responses to waterlogging stress. to better understand the reasons for these differences, among 11 cultivars and 10 genotypes, Mehrgan and Sarang cultivars and ms 93-16 and ms 93-6 genotypes were selected to study some physiological traits. Waterlogging stress led to a decrease photosynthetic pigments, an increase in the malondialdehydeconcentration and an increase in the antioxidant enzymes activity, and in these cases, the differences between these cultivars and genotypes were obvious. There were also differences between severe stress and mild stress, for example, in all studied cultivars, only severe stress could lead to a significant increase in peroxidase enzyme activity, but in the case of catalase, mild stress tolerant cultivars also led to a significant increase.
 
Conclusion
In general, cultivars that had a higher level of antioxidant enzyme activity when faced with waterlogging stress were able to pass through the stress period with less damage to the cell membrane structure (according to the concentration of malondialdehyde) and photosynthetic pigments and showed a lower percentage reduction in dry matter. Mehrgan cultivar had the highest dry matter yield compared to other cultivars and genotypes in all three stress levels, despite the severe decrease in shoot system dry matter yield.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Amora, Y., Chevion, M., & Levine, A. (2000). Anoxia pretreatment protects soybean cells against H2O-induced cell death: possible involvement of peroxidases and of alternative oxidase. FEBS Letters, 477, 175-180.
Bali, A.S., & Sidhu, G.P.S. (2019). Abiotic Stress-Induced Oxidative Stress in Wheat. Wheat Production in Changing Environments, 225-239.
Bannister, J.V., Bannister, W.H., & Rotilio, G. (1987). Aspects of the structure, function and applications of superoxide dismutase. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry, 22, 111–180.
Beers, R.F., & Sizer, I. (1952). A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen by catalase. J. Biochem, 195, 133-140.
Blokhina, O.B., Virolainen, E., & Fagerstedt, K.V. (2003). Antioxidants, oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress: a review. Annals of Botany, 91, 179-194.
Boru, G., van Ginkel, M., Kronstad, W.E., & Boersma, L. (2001). Expression and inheritance of tolerance to waterlogging stress in wheat. Euphytica, 117, 91-98.
Bowler, C., Van Montagu, M., & Inze, D. (1992). Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 43, 83-116.
Fazeli, S.B., Rahnama, A., & Hassibi, P. (2022). Effect of waterlogging stress on yield and some physiological characteristics of two mungbean cultivars under Ahvaz climatic conditions. Plant productions, 45(1), 95-108.
Ghobadi, M.E., Ghobadi, M., & Zebarjadi, A. (2017). Effect of waterlogging at different growth stages on some morphological traits of wheat varieties. International Journal of Biometeorology, 61(4), 635-645.
Ghobadi, M.E., Nadian, H., Bakhshandeh, A., Fathi, G., & Ghobadi, M. (2006). Investigating root growth, biological and grain yield in wheat genotypes under waterlogging stress in different stages of growth. Seed and Plant Journal, 22(4), 513-27. [In Persian]
Herzog, M., Striker, G.G., Colmer, T.D., & Pedersen, O. (2016). Mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in wheat – a review of root and shoot physiology. Plant, Cell and Environment, 39, 1068-1086.
Jackson, M.B., & Colmer, T.D.  (2005). Response and Adaptation by Plants to Flooding Stress. Annals of Botany, 96(4), 501-505.
Li, C., Jiang, D., Wollenweber, B., Li, Y., Dai, T., & Cao, W. (2011). Waterlogging pretreatment during vegetative growth improves tolerance to waterlogging after anthesis in wheat. Plant Science, 180(5), 672-678.
Lichtenthaler, H.K. (1987). Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol, 148, 350-382.
Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., & Randall, R.J. (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin Phenol Reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193, 65-275.
Malik, A.I., Colmer, T.D., Lambers, H., Setter, T.L., & Schortemeyer, M. (2002). Short-term waterlogging has long-term effects on the growth and physiology of wheat. New Phytologist, 153(2), 225-236.
Musgrave, M.E. (1994). Waterlogging effects on yield and photosynthesis in eight winter wheat cultivars. Crop Science, 34, 1314-1318.
Nakano, Y., & Asada, K. (1981). Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant and Cell Physiology, 22(5), 867-880.
Ozcubuknu, S., Ergun, N., & Ilhan, E. (2014). Waterlogging and nitric oxide induce gene expression and increase antioxidant enzyme activity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Acta Biologica Hungarica, 65(1), 47-60.
Pierdomenico, P., William, A., Laurentius, A., & Voesenek, C.J. (2011). Plants and flooding stress. New phytologist, 190, 269-273.
Setter, T.L., & Waters, I. (2003). Review of prospects for germplasm improvement for waterlogging tolerance in wheat, barley and oats. Plant and Soil, 253, 1-34.
Shabala, S. (2011). Physiological and cellular aspects of phytotoxicity tolerance in plants: the role of membrane transporters and implications for crop breeding for waterlogging tolerance. New Phytologist, 190, 289-298.
Soltanzadeh, M., Lak, S., Lakzadeh, I., & Ghohari, M. (2012). Evaluation of Waterlogging Tolerance of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes in Stem Elongation Stage Using Waterlogging Stress Tolerance and Sensitive Indices. Plant productions, 35(1), 117-128.
Tiryakioglu, M., Karanlik, S., & Arslan, M. (2015). Response of bread-wheat seedlings to waterlogging stress. Turkish Jornal of Agriculture and Forestry, 39, 807-816.
Trnka, M., Rotter, R.P., Ruiz-Ramos, M., Kersebaum, K.C., Olesen, J.E., Zalud, Z., & Semenov M.A. (2014). Adverse weather conditions for Europeanwheat production will become more frequent with climate change. Nature Climate Change, 4, 637-643.
Uddin, S., Schilling, R.K., Xu, B., Tahmasbian, I., Napier, T., Dehaan, R., McDonald, G.K., & Tavakkoli, E. (2019). Comparing genotypic variation in wheat in response to transient waterlogging in alkaline sodic soils. Agronomy Australia Conference, 25-29.
Valentovic, P., Luxova, M., Kolarovi, L., & Gasparikora, O. (2006). Effect of osmotic stress on compatible solutes content, memberane stability and water relation in two maizes. Plant, Soil and Environment, 52, 186-191.
Willekens, H., Inzé, D., Van Montagu, M., & van Camp, W. (1995). Catalases in plants. Molecular Breeding, 1, 207–228.
Yan, B., Dai, Q., Liu, X., Huang, S., & Wang, Z. (1996). Flooding‐induced membrane damage, lipid oxidation and activated oxygen generation in corn leaves. Plant and Soil, 179, 261-268.