Investigate the Possibility of Early Prediction of Sweet Cherry Graft Incompatibility by in vitro Techniques

Jalali, Arezoo; Ganji Moghaddam, Ebrahim; Marjani, Ali

doi:10.22055/ppd.2022.37508.1982

Document Type : Research Paper - Tissue Culture

Authors

¹ 1- P.h.D student Horticuture, Department of Agricultur, Faculty Agriculture, , Bojnourd Branch, Islamic Azad University.Bojnourd, Iran

² Associate Professor, Department of crop and Horticulture Science Research, Khorasan Razavi, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran

³ Assistant Professor, Department of Agriculture,, Bojnoord Branch Islamic Azad University, Bojnourd, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22055/ppd.2022.37508.1982

Abstract

Introduction
Graft compatibility is one of the most problems in fruit tree. Determination graft compatibility, it may last a long time but it was achieved in a short time by in vitro techniques. Plants increase their capacity antioxidant rapidly when stress occurs to increase resistance and tolerance to the conditions created. Since grafting in plants is also considered a form of stress, this way. It can be said that the plant's ability to disperse excess energy and neutralize free radicals is impaired, thus increasing the antioxidant capacity to increase the resistance to stress, so in incompatible grafts increases phenolic compounds and peroxidase to minimize oxidative damage compared to compatible grafts. This study Investigation the possibility of early determination of grafting (in) compatibility of sweet cherry by compare phenolic compound and peroxidase activity in vitro techniques.

Materials and Methods
Two factorial experiment was carried out on the base of completely randomized design with three replications. Treatments including the first factor, four levels of sweet cherry cultivars “Bing’’, “Takdaneh”, “Siyah Mashhad”, and “Adli” and the second factor, four levels of rootstocks Gisela-5, Gisela-6 (compatibility control), Mahaleb-168, and GF-305 (incompatibility control). Measurement of total phenolic compounds was determind according to the Folin-Ciocalteu method (Singleton et al., 1999). Antioxidant enzyme extraction was determined with the method of Mac Adam (1992) with some modifications. Analysis of variance was carried out by SAS software ver. 9.1 and mean comparison was conducted using LSD test.

Results and Discussion
The result showed that the highest and lowest percentage of grafting were “Bing” cultivar on Gisela-6 rootstock with an average of 64.21% and “Bing” cultivar on GF-305 rootstock of 1.1%. The highest number of leaves and longitudinal growth of scion was in “Bing” cultivar on Gisela-6. The highest number of roots and root lengths were in “Takdaneh” cultivar on Gisela-6 and “Bing” on Gisela-6. The highest amount of total phenol at the graft union was GF-305 and the lowest at the graft union was Gisela-5. The highest and lowest of peroxidase were at the graft union of “Bing” on-G5-305 and “Bing” and “Siyah mashhad” on Gisela. In general, the highest levels of total phenol and peroxidase at the graft union were higher on the GF-305 incompatible rootstock than Gisela-6 compatible rootstock. Therefore, our finding leads to the conclusion that phenolic compounds and peroxidase activity can be used to pre-screen for incompatible grafts. In general, the amount of total phenol in the grafts made on Gisela-6 (compatible control) and Gisela-5 rootstocks was less than GF-305 (incompatible control). GF-305 is incompatible with cherry cultivars. Phenolic compounds such as Catechins above the graft site can be used as a biochemical marker in the diagnosis of graft incompatibility (Baron et al., 2019). Peroxidase levels in incompatible grafts were higher than compatible grafts. It seems that the peroxidase enzyme can be used to predict incompatible grafts quickly. Preliminary analyzes on the role of peroxidase indicate that this enzyme is involved in the formation of cell wall constituents and in the next step reduces the flexibility of the cell wall by creating cross-linking between phenolic polymers of the cell wall (Cassab & Varner, 1987).

Conclusion
The highest levels of total phenol and peroxidase at the graft union were higher on the GF-305 incompatible rootstock than Gisela-6 compatible rootstock. Therefore, the finding of this study leads to the conclusion that phenolic compounds (mostly) and peroxidase activity can be used to pre-screen for incompatible grafts

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

References

Arghavan, S., Ganji moghaddam, E., & Fahadan, A. (2011). Study of possibility early detection of graft incompatibility in some commercial plum cultivars by phenolic compounds analyses. M.Sc. thesis of Horticulture, Pomology,Islamic Azad University of Shirvan, Shirvan. [InFarsi]

Balapor, Z., Hosseini Moghaddam, H., Zarei, M., & Mollashahi, M. (2020). Micro propagation of penta rootstock (Prunus domestica L.) in the two culture media (MS and B5). Plant Productions, 42(4), 443-454. [In Farsi]

Baron, D., Amaro, A., Pina, A., & Ferreira, G. (2019). An overview of grafting re-establishment in woody fruit species. Scientia Horticulturae, 243, 84-91.

Canan, C., Ozalsan, M., Toremen, H., Sarpkaya, K., & Iskender, E. (2006). In vitro micrografting of pistachio, Pistacia vera L. Var. siirt, on wild pistachio rootstocks. Journal Cell and Molecular Biology, 5, 25-31.

Cassab, G. I., & Varner, J. E. (1987). Immunity localization of extension in developing soybean seed coats by immune gold silver staining and by tissue printing on nitrocellulose paper. Journal of Cell Biotechnology, 105(6-1), 2581-2588.

Dogra, K., Kour, K., Kumar, R., Bakshi. P., & Kumar, V. (2018). Graft incompatibility in horticultural crop. Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science, 7(2), 1805-1820.

Errea, P., Garay, L., & Marin, J. A. (2001). Early detection of graft incompatibility in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) using in vitro techniques. Journal of Physiologia Plantarum, 112(1), 135-141.

Espen, L., Cocucci, M., & Sacchi, G. A. (2005). Differentiation and functional connection of vascular elements in compatible and incompatible pear/quince internode micrografts. Tree Physiology, 25(11), 1419-1425.

Ganji moghaddam, A., & Bouzari, N. (2017). Scientific and practical guide to cherries (planting, holding and harvesting). Tehran: Agricultural Education and Extension Publications. [In Farsi]

Ganji Moghaddam, A., & Gonabadi, A. (2017). Guide to the bases of fruit trees. Tehran: Agricultural education and promotion. [In Farsi]

Gilmour, S. J., & Thomashow, M. F. (1991). Cold acclimation and cold regulated gene expression in ABA mutants of (Arabidopsis thaliana L.). Plant Molecular Biology, 17(6), 1233-1240.

Guclu, S., & Koyuncu, F. (2012). A method for prediction of graft incompatibility in sweet cherry. Notulae Botanicae Horticulturae Agrobotanic, 40(1), 243-246.

Gulen, H., Kuden, A., Postman, J., & Arora. R. (2005). Total protein content and SDS-PAGE in pear scions grafted on quince and pear seedling rootstocks. Turkish Journal of Agriculture, 29(1), 91-96.

Herrero, J., Carrasco, A. E., & Zapata, J. M. (2014). Arabidopsis thaliana peroxidase involved in lignin biosynthesis, in silico promoter analysis and hormonal regulation. Plant physiology Biochemical, 80, 192-202.

Hudina, M., Orazem, P., Jakopic, J., & Stampar, F. (2014). The phenolic content and its involvement in the graft incompatibility process of various pear rootstocks (Pyrus communis L.). Journal of Plant Physiology, 171(5), 76-84.

Irisarri, P., Binczycki, P., Errea, P., Martens, H. J., & Pina, A. (2015). Oxidative stress associated with rootstock scion interactions in pear/quince combinations during early stages of graft development. Journal of Plant Physiology, 176, 25-35.

Isikalan, C., Namli, S., Akbas, F., & Erol, A. (2011). In vitro Micropropagation of almond (Amygdalus communis. Cv. Nonpariel). Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5, 61-65.

Long, L. E., & Kaiser, C. (2010). Sweet cherry rootstocks. In Crane, E. (Ed). A Pacific northwest extension publication (pp: 10-17). Corvallis, Oregon: Oregon State University.

Mac‌adam, J. W., Nelson, C. J., & Sharp, R. E. (1992). Peroxidase activity in the leaf elongation zone of tall fescue. Journal of Plant Physiology, 99(3), 294-878.

Melo, E. T., Pio, R., & Balbi, R. V. (2017). Anatomic compatibility of pear and quince trees grafted on pyrus calleryana L. & Chaenomeles sinensis L. rootstocks. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 52‌(10), 877-886.

Mohamadzade, N., & Hamidi, H. (2016). Investigation of the effects of culture medium, disinfection and hormonal treatments on micro environment (Mallus domestica L. Borkh.). Plant Productions, 5(1), 41-54. [In Farsi]

Musacchi, S., Masia, A., & Fachinello, J. (2000). Variation of some enzymatic activities in relationship to scion/ stock compatibility in pear/quince combinations. Acta Horticulture, 596, 389-392

Nadaf, M. I. (2018). Optimization of micro-grafting conditions of terminal meristems of several cherry cultivars on Gisela-6 growing base in vitro conditions. Ph.D. thesis of Horticulture, Physiology and Plant breeding, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran. [In Farsi]

Neuyen, T. B., Ketsa, S., & Doorn, W. (2003). Relationship between and the activities of polyphenol oxidase and phenylalnine ammonia-lyase in banana peel during low temperature storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 30, 187-193.

Pina, A., & Errea, P. (2008). Influence of graft incompatibility on gene expression and enzymatic activity of UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. Journal of Plant Science, 174, 502–509.

Pina, A., & Errea, P. (2009). Morphological and histochemical features of compatible and incompatible stem union. Acta Horticulture, 814, 453-456.

Porika, H. K., Nimbolkar, B., Rajashekar, B., & Hussain, S. (2016). Graft compatibility- incompatibility in fruit crops, mechanism and determination technique. Asian Journal of Horticulture, 2(1), 252-260.

Prabpreea, A., Sangsil, P., Nualsri, C., & Nakkanong, K. (2018). Expression profile of phenylalanine Ammonia- Lyase (PAL) and phenolic content during early stages of graft development in bud grafted Hevea brasiliensis. Biocatal. Agric Journal of Biotechnol, 14, 88-95.

Rahmati, M., Arzani, K., Yadollahi, A., & Abdollahi, H. (2014). Investigation of the pattern of accumulation of phenolic and flavonoid materials above and below the graft site in some European and Asian pear cultivars (Pyrus communis L.) on several different rootstocks. 9th Congress of Horticultural Sciences. Ahvaz. [In Farsi]

Simon, A., Mngomba, E., Toitfestus, S., & Akinnifesi, K. (2008). The relationship between graft incompatibility and phenols in (Uapaca kirkiana L.) Muell Arg. Scientia Horticulturae, 117(3), 212-218.

Singleton, V. L., Orthofer, R., & Lamuela-Raventos, R. M. (1999). Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol, 299, 152-178.

Zamanipor, M. (2015). The effect of plant growth regulators explants size and media culture on the multiplication of seven cultivars of sweet cherry and investigation of possibility of their micro grafting in vitro. Ph.D. thesis of Horticulture, Physiology and Plant breeding, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad. [In Farsi]

Investigate the Possibility of Early Prediction of Sweet Cherry Graft Incompatibility by in vitro Techniques

References

References

Volume 45, Issue 2September 2022Pages 287-298

Volume 45, Issue 2
September 2022
Pages 287-298