Document Type : Research Paper - Agronomy


1 M.Sc. Graduate of Agronomy, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran


Mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) is one of the most important legumes in the world. This nitrogen-stabilizing plant has rapid growth and a short growth period, leading to improved soil fertility. Mung bean is widely cultivated in tropical and subtropical regions of Asia due to its high adaptation range. Plants are obligate aerobic organisms and thus depend on O2 to grow and compete successfully with neighbouring plants in natural environments. Waterlogging stress is one of the most important factors limiting the planting of mung bean under Ahvaz conditions.
Materials and Methods
In order to study the effects of waterlogging stress on some agronomic and physiological characteristics of two Mung bean cultivars, a pot experiment was conducted as split factorial in a completely randomized block design with three replications in the field. The main plots were different growth stages consisted of vegetative growth stage, the beginning of flowering, grain filling stage, and three growth stages. The combination of stress levels (control and waterlogging stress) and two Mung bean cultivars (Hindi and Omrani) were as subplots.
Results and Discussion
Waterlogging was caused to decrease significantly dry matter and grain yield in both cultivars at each growth stages, In Hindi cultivar, the highest grain yield reduction was observed at flowering stage and the least difference was observed in waterlogging stress at all three growth stages. In Omrani cultivar, the highest grain yield reduction was observed in waterlogging stress at all three growth stages, and the least grain yield decrease at flowering stage. Overall, the reductions in dry weight and grain yield were higher in Omrani than Hindi cultivar at three growth stages. Therefore, in stress-prone areas such as Ahvaz where summer plants such as Mung bean are exposed to waterlogging stress at different growth stages, Hindi cultivar is suggested for cultivation. Waterlogging stress did not show a significant effect on grain weight and grain number per pod, but significantly reduced the number of pods per plant. The number of pods per plant was significantly more important in determining yield and had a positive and significant correlation (r = 0.846 **) with grain yield. The reason of difference between two cultivars was the better physiological compatibility of Hindi cultivar under stress conditions, including higher levels of photosynthesis and photosynthetic pigments contents. When plants were treated only with waterlogging stress in one growth stage, the Omrani cultivar could compensate some damages due to its indeterminate growth and phenological flexibility, as the period of pod formation was longer in this cultivar. SPAD value had the highest correlation with grain yield (r=0.707**) compared to other photosynthesis-related traits and could be used as a marker trait for selection of tolerant cultivars because of its ease, speed, cheapness and the possibility to measure this trait in the field.
The results indicated that mung bean yield decrease in response to waterlogging stress, depending on growth stages, and experimental duration. The reductions in grain yield was impacted by the growth stage subjected to waterlogging stress. Moreover, the Hindi cultivar seems to be more tolerant to waterlogging in Khuzestan region


Main Subjects

Ahmed, S., Nawata, E., & Sakuratani, T. (2000). Changes of endogenous ABA and ACC, and their correlations to photosynthesis and water relations in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczak cv. KPS1) during waterlogging. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 57(3), 278-284.
Bailey-Serres, J., & Voesenek, L. A. (2008). Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59, 313-339.
Bradford, K.J. (1983). Effects of soil flooding on leaf gas exchange of tomato plants. Plant Physiology, 73(2), 475-479.
Bradford, K. J., & Hsiao, T. C. (1982). Stomatal behavior and water relations of waterlogged tomato plants. Plant Physiology, 70(5), 1508-1513.
Caemmerer, S. V., & Edmondson, D. L. (1986) The relationship between steady state gas exchange in vivo RuP2 carboxylase activity and some carbon cycle intermediates in Raphanus sativus. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 13(5), 669-688.
Chotechuen, S. (1996). Breeding of mungbean for resistance to various environmental stresses. In P. Srinives, C. Kitbamroong & S. Miyazaki (Eds), Mungbean germplasm: Collection, evaluation and utilization for breeding program eds srinives. Proceedings of the Workshop on Mung bean Germplasm, pp. 52-59.
Jackson, M. B., & Drew, M. C. (1984). Effects of flooding on growth and metabolism of herbaceous plants. In T. Kozlowski (Ed.), Flooding and plant growth (pp. 47-128). New York: Academic Press.
Jackson, M. B., & Kowalewska, A. K. B. (1983). Positive and negative messages from roots induce foliar desiccation and stomatal closure in flooded pea plants. Journal of Experimental Botany, 34(142), 493-506.
Khalafi, M., Gharineh, M.H., Bakhshandeh, A., Lakzadeh, E., & Fathi, G. (2013). Effects of various periods of water logging surface stress in the different growth stages on yield and yield components of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under Khuzestan environment. Plant Productions, 36‌(2), 87-97. [In Farsi]
Kumar, P., Pal, M., Joshi, R., & Sairam, R. K. (2013). Yield, growth and physiological responses of mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] genotypes to waterlogging at vegetative stage. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 19(2), 209-220.
Lichtenthaler H. K. (1987). Chlorophylls and cartenoides: Pigments of photosynthetice bio-membranes. S.P. Colowick & N.O. Kaplan (Eds.). Method in enzymol (Vol. 48. pp. 350-382). NewYork: Academic press.
Pan, R., Jiang, W., Wang, Q., Xu, L., Shabala, S., & Hang, W. Y. (2019). Differential response of
growth and photosynthesis in diverse cotton genotypes under hypoxia stress. Photosynthetica, 57 (3), 772-779.
Pierdomenico, P., William, A., Laurentius, A., & Voesenek, C.J. (2011). Plants and flooding stress. New Phytologist, 190, 269-273.
Poehlman, J. M. (1991). The mungbean. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH. P. 375.
Rafiqul Islam, M., Abdul Hamid, M., Abdul Karim, M., Moynul Haque, Q., Abdul Khaliq, J., & Uddin, A. (2008). Gas exchanges and yield responses of mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) genotypes differing in flooding tolerance. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 30‌(5), 697-707.
Sage, R. F. (1990). A model describing the regulation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase, electron-transport, and triose phosphate use in response to light intensity and CO2 in C3 plants. Plant Physiology, 94, 1728-1734.
Sage, R. F., Sharkey, T. D., & Seemann, J. R. (1988) The in vivo response of the ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activation state and the pool sizes of photosynthetic metabolites to elevated CO2 in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Planta, 174, 407-416.
Selina, A., Nawata, E., & Sakuratani, T. (2002). Effects of Waterlogging at vegetative and reproductive growth stages on photosynthesis, leaf water potential and yield in mung bean. Plant Production Science, 5(2), 117-123.
Sena Gomes, A. R., & Kozlowski, T. T. (1980). Growth responses and adaptations of Fraxinus pennsylvanica seedlings to flooding. Plant Physiology, 66, 267-271.
Singh, D. P., & Singh, B. B. (2011). Breeding for tolerance to abiotic stresses in mungbean. Journal of Food Legumes, 24(2), 83-90.
Soltanzadeh, M., Lak, S.H., Lakzadeh, E., & Gohary, M. (2012). Evaluation of waterlogging tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes in stem elongation stage using waterlogging stress tolerance and sensitive indices. Plant Productions, 35(1), 117-128. [In Farsi]
Tian, L., Bi, W., Xuan, L., Sun, L., & Li. J. (2019). Effects of waterlogging stress on the physiological response and grain-filling characteristics of spring maize (Zea mays L.) under field conditions. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 41‌(5), 63.
Topa, M. A., & Cheeseman, J. M. (1992). Effects of root hypoxia and a low P supply on relative growth, carbon dioxide exchange rates and carbon partitioning in Pinus serotina seedlings. Physiologia Plantarum, 86, 136-144.
Trought, M. C. T., & Drew, M. C. (1980). The development of waterlogging in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.) I shoot and root growth in relation to changes in the concentrations of dissolved gases and solutes in the soil solution. Plant and Soil, 54(1), 77-79.
Varma, A., Mishra, S. P., Tripathi, A., & Shukla, U. K. (2018). Biochemical composition and storage protein profiling of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) cultivars. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7(4), 708-713.
Yordanova, R. Y., & Popova, L. P. (2007). Flooding-induced changes in photosynthesis and oxidative status in maize plants. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 29(6), 535-541.