نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار پژوهش، بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی – باغی‌، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اصفهان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اصفهان، ایران

2 استادیار پژوهش، بخش تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اصفهان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اصفهان، ایران

چکیده

چکیده
به‌منظور بررسی و مقایسه عملکرد یونجه در شرایط کشت بدون شخم و مقایسه آن با روش کشت معمول با کاربرد مقادیر مختلف بذر، آزمایشی طی سال‌های 1393 تا 1395 در شهرستان سمیرم استان اصفهان، با استفاده از طرح کرت‌های خرد‌شده نواری در قالب بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار انجام شد. در این آزمایش عامل روش کاشت در دو سطح بدون شخم و شخم متداول به‌عنوان فاکتور اصلی (افقی)، میزان بذر یونجه توده مهاجران در چهار سطح 10، 20، 30 و 40 کیلوگرم در هکتار به‌عنوان فاکتور فرعی (عمودی) و چین‌برداری به‌عنوان عامل زمانلحاظ شد. پارامترهای اندازه‌گیری در تیمار‌های مختلف شامل تراکم بوته یونجه پس از استقرار در سال اول، تراکم علف‌های هرز، وزن تر و خشک علف‌های هرز، میانگین دو ساله عملکرد محصول تر و خشک علوفه و تراکم ساقه در چین‌های مختلف بودند. بر‌اساس نتایج به‌دست‌آمده، در میزان علوفه تر و خشک تولیدی و تعداد ساقه در بین دو روش کشت بدون شخم و کشت متداول، اختلاف معنی‌داری وجود نداشت. تعداد بوته استقرار یافته در واحد سطح در دو روش کشت، اختلاف معنی‌دار داشتند به‌گونه‌ای که تراکم بوته یونجه در سیستم بدون شخم بیشتر بود. مقایسه تعداد و وزن تر و خشک علف‌های هرز نشان داد که وزن تر و خشک علف‌های هرز در روش کشت بدون شخم قبل از چین اول بیشتر از شخم متداول بود. بر پایه نتایج به‌دست‌آمده، استفاده از سیستم کشت بدون شخم با مصرف 30 کیلوگرم بذر در هکتار به‌ترتیب با تولید 60760 و 10770 کیلوگرم در هکتار علوفه تر و خشک بیشترین عملکرد محصول را به خود اختصاص داد.  

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Different Seed Rates on Yield and Some Agronomic Traits of Alfalfa Mohageran Ecotype in no-till and conventional tillage Methods in Semirom Region

نویسندگان [English]

  • Masoud Torabi 1
  • Mohsen Heidarisoltanabadi 2

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Crop Science Horticulture, Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Isfahan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Isfahan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Abstract
 
Background and Objectives
In agriculture section, more than half of the consumption energy is used for tillage. No-till systems can provide optimal conditions for some crops production because of less energy usage, optimal watering, and physical regime for plant and optimal microbial activities for humus synthesis. Although the climate change and the drought in recent years have restricted alfalfa cultivated area, it still provides about 40% of animal feed within 35 million hectares. Alfalfa with 20% protein is the first forage in the world.
 
Materials and Methods
In order to compare alfalfa cultivation in no-till and tillage methods with different rate of seeding, an experiment was carried out as RCBD in the form of a strip split plot plan, during 2013-2015 in Semiroum region, Esfahan province, Iran. The main strip plot (horizontal) was cultivation methods including no-till and conventional tillage methods, and strip subplot (vertical) was the four rate of alfalfa seeding including 10, 20, 30, and 40 kg/ha. The cutting time of alfalfa was the time factor in treatments. The planting operation was carried out after harvesting of barley cereals with 30% residual straw in the mid-summer. The measurable parameters in different treatment included the number of established plants in the first spring, fresh and dry forage yield divided different cuts, stem density divided different cuts, and the numbers and weight of weed.
 
Results
Variance analysis showed that there is no significant difference between no-till and conventional tillage methods in terms of fresh and dry forage production. The seeding rate as a sub-factor has significant effect (level 1%) on fresh and dry forage and number of stem per unit area, whereas the interaction effect between cultivation methods with seeding rate has not significant effect on forage production and number of stem per unit area. The plant density, and the number of weeds were affected from cultivation methods (conventional tillage and no-till), whereas the plant density and number of weeds in no-till method was superior to tillage system. The plant density was varied between different of seeding rate, whereas the number of weed has not affected from the seeding rate.
 
Discussion
The obtained results indicated that regarding the alfalfa cultivation in no-till method (with 30% residual straw), not only the forage production was equal to conventional tillage method, but also the number of plant in no-till method was higher than tillage method. It seems that the superiority of no-till method in plant referred to proper seed placement because of minimum plough of soil in no-till method. However, the number of weed in no-till method was higher than conventional tillage method, but this item had no effect on the yield and stability of alfalfa, because the presence of weeds was only related to the first cutting. Using the no-till cultivation method with 30 kg of seeding rate per hectare produced 60.76 ton/ha fresh forage and 10.77 ton/ha dry forage.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Alfalfa yield
  • Conservational tillage
  • No till
  • Plant density
References
Abadouz, G. R., Rahnama, A. and Fathi, G. (2013). Effects of sowing patterns and density on grain yield and yield components of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cv. Mesa-Sirsa in South Khozestan conditions. Plant Productions, 36(3), 53-64. [In Farsi]
Afsharmanesh, G. (2000). Effects of seeding on dry matter yield of alfalfa cultivars in Jiroft region. Presented at the 6th Iranian Congress of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, Mazandaran.
Afsharmanesh, G. (2009). Study of some morphological traits and selection of drought-resistant alfalfa cultivars (Medicago sativa L.) in Jiroft, Iran. Plant Ecophysiology. 3(2009), 109-118.
Anonymous. (1999). ASAE standard (S358.2). Moisture measurement – forages. St. Joseph. MI.
Anonymous. (2018). Agricultural statistics (First volume: Crop products). Tehran: Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Deputy of Planning and Economics, ICT Center. [In Farsi]
Arzani, H. (2009). Forage quality and daily need livestock grazing of pasture (1st ed.). Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Farsi]
Asodar, H. and Sabzehzar, H. (2008). Tillage- tools and appliances. Tehran: Shahr Publication. [In Farsi]
Assadi, A. and Afiyoni, D. (2006).Using conservation tillage in wheat – silage corn rotation. Presented at the 4th National Congress on Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization, Tabriz.
Brothers, A., Schmidt, J. R., Kells, J. J. and Hesterman, O. B. (2013). Alfalfa establishment with and without spring-applied herbicides. Journal of Production Agriculture Abstract-Research, 7(4), 494-501.
Chaji, H., Afshar Shamanabadi, H. and Jamili, H. (2006). The effect of several tillage methods on soil physical properties, fuel efficiency and cotton yield. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 7(26), 159-173. [In Farsi]
Duiker, S. W. (2015). No-till alfalfa should be part and parcel of a no-till system. Retrieved from: http://extension.psu.edu/plants/crops/news/2015/04/no-till-alfalfa.
Food and Agricultural Organization. (2014). Production year book. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.
Gray, A., Bjornestad, L., Despain, J., Gill, J., Jenkins, J., Langbehn, J., Mesbah, A.and Ryan, M. (1998). Variable seeding rates for alfalfa: Yield and forage quality, Presented at the 36th North American Alfalfa Improvement Conference, Montana.
Hall, M. H, Nelson, C. J, Coutts, J. H. and Stout, R. C. (2004). Effect of seeding rate on alfalfa stand longevity. Agronomy Journal, 96(3), 717-722.
Hart, R. H., Pearce, R. B., Chatterton, N. J., Carlson, G. E., Branes, D. K. and Hanson, C. H. (1978). Alfalfa yield, specific leaf weight, CO2 exchange rate, and morphology. Crop Science, 18(5), 649-653.
Karimi, H. (1996). Planting and breeding of forage crop. Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Farsi]
Kephart, K. D., Twidwell, E. K., Bortnem, R. and Boe, A. (1992). Alfalfa yield components responses to seeding rate several years after establishment. Agronomy Journal, 84(5), 827-831.
Lamb, J. F. S., Johnson, L. D., Barnes, D. K. and Marquez-Ortiz, J. J. (1991). A method to characterize root morphology traits in alfalfa. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 80(1), 97-104.
Lioveras, J, Chocarro, C, Freixes, O, Arque, E, Moreno, and Santiveri, F. (2008). Yield, yield components, and forage nutritive value of alfalfa as affected by seeding rate under irrigated conditions. Agronomy Journal, 100(1), 191-197.
Martens, G. (2001). Economics of rotations. Presented at the 13th Annual Meeting, Conference and Trade Show of the Saskatchewan Soil Conservation Association, Saskatchewan.
Miri, Kh. (2013). Effect of cropping method and seed rate on forage yield and some traits of alfalfa nikshahri. Scientific Journal-Extension of Research Findings in Crop and Garden Plants, 3(2), 137-147. [In Farsi]
Moeinizadeh, M., Piri, E., Tavasoli, A. and Shojaei, S. (2017). Study of quantitative and qualitative forage yield of alfalfa cultivars (Medicago sativa L.) in different harvest in Khash region. Journal of Applied Research of Plant Ecophysiology, 3(2), 127-140. [In Farsi]
Mohamdi Gol, R. and Javadi, A. (2013). Sustainable tillage. Technical publication, No. 45, Agricultural and Technical Engineering Research Institute Publication. [In Farsi]
Mueller, S. C, Frate, C. A. and Mathews, M. C. (2008). Alfalfa stand establishment. In C. G. Summers and D. H. Putnam (Eds.), Irrigated alfalfa management for Mediterranean and desert zones (pp. 38-56). Oakland: University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources Publications.
Nekoyanfar, Z., Lack, S. H. and Abadouz, G .R. (2017). Assessment effect of cutting time and soil salinity on quality and quantity forage yield of five alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Varieties under Ahvaz Conditions. Plant Productions, 40(3), 113-127. [In Farsi]
Pittelkow, C. M., Linquist, B. A., Lundy, M. E., Liang, X., Groenigen, J. V., Natasj, J., L. and Kessel, C. V. (2015). When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis., Field Crops Research, 183, 156-168.
Sheaffer, C. C., Martin, N. P., Lamb, J. F. S., Cuomo, G. R., Jewett, J. G. and Quering, S. R. (2000). Leaf and stem properties of alfalfa entries. Agronomy Journal, 92(4), 733-739.
Taki, A., Assadi, A., and Solhi, M., (2009). Conservation tillage in arid areas and its need for sustainable agriculture. Isfahan: Isfahan agriculture Jihad organization. [In Farsi]
Undersander, D. (1999). Seeding rate of different alfalfa seed lots. Retrieved from: http://www.uwex. edu/ces/ forage/pubs/seed rate.
Undersander, D., Cosgrove, D., Cullen, E., Grau, C., Rice, M. E., Renz, M., Sheaffer, C., Glen Shewmaker, G. and Sulc, M. (2011). Alfalfa management guide. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Inc.
Volenec, J. J. and Cherney, J. H. (1990). Yield components, morphology and forage quality of multifoliolate alfalfa phenotypes. Crop Science, 30(6), 1234-1238.
Yazdani, A., Naderi, R. Fazeli, A. A. and Bahrani, M. J. (2015). Effect of planting methods and seeding rates on yield of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) CV. Hamedani in Bajgah, Fars Province. Journal of Crop Production and Processing Isfahan University of Technology, 5(15), 167-176. [In Farsi]
Younesi Alamouti, M. and Mohammadi, P. (2015). Field Evaluation of some tillage practices in rainfed wheat planting: Their effects on crop yield components and implements. GiGR Journal, 17(2), 45-56. [In Farsi]
Younesi Alamouti, M., Mohammadi, P. and Jozeyan, A. (2015). Effects of conservation tillage practices in rainfed wheat planting on weed density and crop yield. Journal of Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 21(1), 35-39. [In Farsi]
 
 © 2020 by the authors. Licensee SCU, Ahvaz, Iran. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0 license) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)