Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.Sc. Student Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Khuzestan Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Abstract
Background and Objectives
Nowadays, regarding the adverse effect of war and use of military weapons in the environment and also its limitations against cereal cultivation and population growth, the use of lands affected by military weapons in order to produce foods for human is a critical necessity. One of the most effective factors on wheat yield management is the application of zeolite as a source of manure and monitoring heavy metal concentrations affected by this mineral. The best option is to use zeolites as inorganic fertilizers and also for monitoring polluted by the mineral elements. So, studying the effect of zeolite on yield characteristics of wheat in polluted soil with chemical weapons seems to be necessary.
Materials and Methods
This experiment was carried out in a completely randomized factorial design with three replications where the treatments were polluted and non-polluted soil samples and four amounts of zeolite (0, 0.5, 1.5 and 2.5 % w/w).
Results
The results showed that the effect of zeolite on root dry matter was significant in polluted and non-polluted soils. The most amount of applied zeolite led to increasing dry matter to 11.11 g/pot in polluted soil and 6.93 g/pot in non-polluted soil. Also, the effect of zeolite on 1000-grain weight in polluted and non-polluted soils was significant. The maximum 1000-grain weight was observed in 2.5 % zeolite in polluted soil and the minimum was observed in non-used zeolite treatment in non-polluted soil. Effect of zeolite treatment on number of grains per spikelet and number of spikelet per spike was not significant in non-polluted soil. Results of this experiment showed that the effect of zoelite on grain yield in polluted and non-polluted soil was significant. The maximum grain yield was observed in 2.5% zeolite treatment with 63.2 g/pot and the minimum was obtained in non-used zeolite treatment in non-polluted soil with 8.8 g/pot.
Discussion
In general, the zeolite has a significant effect on agronomic traits and yield of wheat. That was due to favorable physical and chemical properties, such as porosity, air permeability, cation exchange capacity, enhancing the long-term availability of nutrients and trapping heavy metals of bombs and weapons and reducing the negative impact of these elements in the soil, which lead to plant health.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
Abrol, I. P., Bronson, K. F., Duxbury, J. M. and Gupta, R. K. (2002). Long-term soil fertility experiment in rice- wheat cropping system. Rice-Wheat consortium for the Indo-Gangetic plains, New Delhi, India.
Alidadi, H. (2008). Investigation and selection of a suitable medium for preparation of vermicomposte. Presented at the 3th Congress of Application of Recycled Resources in Agriculture, Islamic Azad University of Khorasgan, Khorasgan. [In Farsi]
Amiri, A., Tohidi, A. A., Javaheri, M. A. and Mohamadin Nezhad, Gh. (2011). Investigation of the effect of cultivation date, cultivar and azetobacter on wheat yield in cold Bardsir region. Journal of Crop Improvement, 12(1), 11-19.
Bahreini,T. M., Rezaei, M. and Movahedi Naeini, S. A. (2008). Effect of zeolite on physical and fertility characteristics of soil.Tehran: Amirkabir University of Technology Tehran. [In Farsi]
Fajeria, N. K., Baligar, V. S. and Jones, H. A. (1999). Plant growth and nutrition. Translated by Ghodratollah Fathi. Mashhad: Jahad Daneshgahi of Mashhad Publication. [In Farsi]
Fathi, M. and Chorom, M. (2013). The effect of zeolite on heavy metals in soils treated with sewage sludge and corn growth. M.Sc. Thesis, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz. [In Farsi]
Ghobadi, M. (1999). Effect of shrub diversity on tillering and its relationship with the yield and yield components of four different wheat species at Ahvaz weather conditions.M.Sc. Thesis, of Agronomy, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz. [In Farsi]
Karimi, H. (2002). Weeds of Iran. Tehran: Center of Publication of Tehran.
Kavoosi, M. and Rahimi, M. (2003). Effect of application of zeolite on rice yield. Presented at the 8th Congress of Soil Science, University of Gilan, Gilan. [In Farsi]
Leaniny, J. (2000). Environmental and health: Lsimpact of war. Centre for Advanced Materials Joining (CAMJ), 163(9), 1157-1161.
Madani, H., Farhadi, A., Pazoki, A. R. and Changizi, M. (2009). Effect of different amount of nitrogen and zeolite on quality and quantity of potato in Arak, Iran. The Innovative Findings in Agriculture, 3(4), 379-391.
Mahmoodabadi, M. R., Abdi, F., Adhami, E. and Hadarbadi, G. H. (2008). Effects of zeolite application cadmium toxicity, growth, nodulation and chemical composition of soybean. Iran International Zeolite Conference. Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Mirzadeh, H. (2011). War and some wounds on earth. Etemad New spaper 9th year of publication, Tehran. [In Farsi]
Pazoki, A. (2010). Effect of different amount of zeolite and low water tension on yield components and harvest index of Brassica napus L. in shahrerey district. Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 6(1), 1-16.
Polat, E., Karaca, M., Demir, H. and Onus, A. N. (2004). Use of natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) in agriculture. Journal of Fruit Oman and Plant Research Special, 12, 183-189.
Saeeshahi, R. (2008). Iran is surrounded by 16 million mines. Institute of Education Sciences Sacred Defense, National Defense University, Tehran. [In Farsi]
Shiranirad, A., Moradiaghdam, A., Taherkhani, T., Eskandari, K. and Nazarigolshan, A. (2011). Evaluation of the reaction of rapeseed on different amount of nitrogen and moisture regimes in both application and lack of application of zeolite. Plant Ecophysiology Journal, 3(4), 296-306.