Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.Sc. Student of Agronomy of Ramin Agricultural and Natural Resources University, Ahvaz

2 Professor of Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resourses University,

3 Professor of Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resourses University

4 Assistant Professor of Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resourses University

Abstract

In order to determine the critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays L.), a field study was conducted at the Ramin University ofAhvaz Research Field in 2009. The experiment was designed according to randomized complete block design. Treatments consisted of two different periods of weed interference, a weed-free period and a weed removal period, imposed at V2, V5, V8, V11, Tassel, and harvest (based on phonological stages of corn development). The relationships between grain yield and different weedy or weed-free periods were determined via regression analyses. Cyperus sp., Echinochloa crus-galli, Convolvulus arvensis and malva sp. were naturally infested on experimental plots. Results suggested that a weed-free period between 2-11 leaf stages of maize (GDD= 500-1125) was enough to provide acceptable grain yield. Based on weed infested treatments, a weed free period until theV8 stage was enough to reduce weeds number and dry weight to 64 and 84/6% respectly. Weed interference until late in the season reduces grain yield, biologic yield and harvest index of corn to 36, 28/6 and 19/6% respectly. Thus, it is possible to optimize the timing of weed control, which can serve to reduce the costs and side effects of intensive weed control.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. منابع

    1. اصغری، ج. و چراغی، غ. ر. 1382. دوره بحرانی کنترل علف­های هرز در دو رقم دیررس و متوسط­رس ذرت دانه­ای در کرمانشاه. مجله علوم زراعی ایران. 5 ( 4): 285-
    2. فاتح، ا.، شریف­زاده، ف.، مظاهری، د. و باغستانی، م. ع. 1385. ارزیابی رقابت سلمه­تره و الگوی کاشت ذرت روی عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد ذرت دانه­ای سینگل کراس 704. پژوهش و سازندگی در زراعت و باغبانی، (73) : 87-
    3. هاشمی دزفولی، ا. و هربت، ا. 1371. تاثیر آرایش برگ و تراکم بوته بر عملکرد ذرت. تحقیقات کشاورزی ایران،
       1 (11) : 89-104. 
    4. هادیزاده، م. ح. و علیمرادی، ل. 1384. دوره بحرانی کنترل علف ­های هرز در ذرت دانه­ای. اولین همایش علوم علف­های هرز ایران، صص 97-100.
    5. کوچکی، ع.، ظریف کتابی، ح. و نخ فروش، ع. 1380. رهیافت­های اکولوژیکی، مدیریت علف­های هرز (ترجمه). انتشارات دانشگاه مشهد، 458 ص.
    6. مکاریان، ح.، بنایان، م. و رحیمیان مشهدی، ح. 1382. تاثیر تاریخ کاشت و تراکم ذرت بر توان رقابتی ذرت با تاج­خروس. تحقیقات کشاورزی ایران. 1 )2: (271-279.
    7. نور محمدی، ق.، سیادت، س. ع. و کاشانی، ع. 1377. زراعت غلات. انتشارات دانشگاه چمران، ( 1) : 416-
    8. Bukan, B. 2004. Critical period for control in cotton in Turkey. Weed Research, 44: 404 - 412.
    9. Evans, S.P., Knezevic, Z.S., Lindquist, J.L., Shapiro, C.A., and Blankenship, E.E. 2003. Nitrogen application influence the critical period for weed control in corn. Weed Science, 51: 408- 417.
    10. Hanway, J. 1971. How a corn plant develops. State University of Science and Technology- Cooperative Extension Services- Ames., Iowa-Special Report, 48: 15.
    11. Knezevic, S.Z., Evans, S.P., Blankenship, E.E., Van Acker, R.C., and Lindquist, J.L. 2002. Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Science, 50: 773-786.
    12. Rajcan, I., and Swanton, C.J. 2001. Understanding maize-weed competition: resource competition, light quality and the whole plant. Field Crops Research, 71: 139-150.
    13. Uremis, I., Uludag, A., Can ulger, A., and Cakir, B. 2009. Determination of critical period for weed control in the second crop corn under Mediterranean conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(18): 475- 480.
    14. Williams, M., Boydston, R.A., and Davis, A.S. 2008. Differential tolerance in sweet corn to wild-proso millet (Panicum Miliaceum ) interference. Weed Science, 56: 91- 96.